Mehta Rajendra H, O'Gara Patrick T, Bossone Eduardo, Nienaber Christoph A, Myrmel Truls, Cooper Jeanna V, Smith Dean E, Armstrong William F, Isselbacher Eric M, Pape Linda A, Eagle Kim A, Gilon Dan
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Aug 21;40(4):685-92. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02005-3.
We sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of elderly patients with acute type A aortic dissection.
Few data exist on the clinical manifestations and outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection in an elderly patient cohort.
We categorized 550 patients with type A aortic dissection enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection into two age strata (<70 and >or=70 years) and compared their clinical features, management, and in-hospital events.
Thirty-two percent of patients with type A dissection were aged >or=70 years. Marfan syndrome was exclusively associated with dissection in the young, whereas hypertension, atherosclerosis and iatrogenic dissection predominated in older patients. Typical symptoms (abrupt onset of chest or back pain) and signs (aortic regurgitation murmur or pulse deficits) of dissection were less common among the elderly. Fewer elderly patients were managed surgically than younger patients (64% vs. 86%, p < 0.0001). Hypotension occurred more frequently (46% vs. 32%, p = 0.002) and focal neurologic deficits less frequently (18% vs. 26%, p = 0.04) among the elderly. In-hospital mortality was higher among older patients (43% vs. 28%, p = 0.0006). Logistic regression analysis identified age >or=70 years as an independent predictor of hospital death for acute type A aortic dissection (odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.8; p = 0.03).
Our study shows significant differences between older (age >or=70 years) and younger (age <70 years) patients with acute type A aortic dissection in their clinical characteristics, management, and hospital outcomes. Future research should evaluate strategies to improve outcomes in this high-risk elderly cohort.
我们旨在评估老年急性A型主动脉夹层患者的临床特征、治疗及预后。
关于老年患者队列中急性A型主动脉夹层的临床表现和预后的数据很少。
我们将国际急性主动脉夹层注册研究中纳入的550例A型主动脉夹层患者分为两个年龄层(<70岁和≥70岁),并比较他们的临床特征、治疗及住院期间的事件。
32%的A型夹层患者年龄≥70岁。马方综合征仅与年轻患者的夹层相关,而高血压、动脉粥样硬化和医源性夹层在老年患者中更为常见。夹层的典型症状(突发胸痛或背痛)和体征(主动脉反流杂音或脉搏缺失)在老年人中较少见。接受手术治疗的老年患者比年轻患者少(64%对86%,p<0.0001)。低血压在老年人中更频繁发生(46%对32%,p = 0.002),局灶性神经功能缺损在老年人中较少见(18%对26%,p = 0.04)。老年患者的住院死亡率更高(43%对28%,p = 0.0006)。逻辑回归分析确定年龄≥70岁是急性A型主动脉夹层住院死亡的独立预测因素(比值比1.7,95%置信区间1.1 - 2.8;p = 0.03)。
我们的研究表明,年龄≥70岁的老年急性A型主动脉夹层患者与年龄<70岁的年轻患者在临床特征、治疗及住院结局方面存在显著差异。未来的研究应评估改善这一高风险老年人群预后的策略。