Bagby R Michael, Ryder Andrew G, Ben-Dat Dahlia, Bacchiochi Jason, Parker James D A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Clarke Site, 250 College Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5T 1R8.
J Pers Disord. 2002 Aug;16(4):304-16. doi: 10.1521/pedi.16.4.304.24128.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to determine whether the latent structure underlying the items composing the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five scales (PSY-5; Harkness, McNulty, & Ben-Porath, 1995) is representative of the theoretical model that informed their construction. Results from the CFA revealed a good fit between the hypothesized five-factor model and the obtained latent factor structure in both clinical (n = 284) and nonclinical (n = 351) samples. Moreover, the PSY-5 model proved to be a better fit than a random five-factor model and a one-factor model. Correlations between the PSY-5 scales and a set of MMPI-2 (DSM-IV) personality disorder scales provided additional evidence of convergent and discriminant validity.
验证性因素分析（CFA）用于确定构成明尼苏达多项人格测验第二版（MMPI-2）人格心理病理学五分量表（PSY-5；哈克尼斯、麦克纳尔蒂和本-波拉特，1995年）的项目背后的潜在结构是否代表了为其构建提供依据的理论模型。验证性因素分析的结果显示，在临床样本（n = 284）和非临床样本（n = 351）中，假设的五因素模型与获得的潜在因素结构之间拟合良好。此外，PSY-5模型被证明比随机五因素模型和单因素模型拟合得更好。PSY-5分量表与一组MMPI-2（《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版）人格障碍分量表之间的相关性为聚合效度和区分效度提供了额外证据。
Zotero 插件