Grossman E S, Cleaton-Jones P E, Côrtes D F, Daya N P, Parak R B, Fatti L P, Hargreaves J A
Dental Research Institute of Medical Research Council and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
SADJ. 2002 Jun;57(6):215-20.
This study was undertaken to validate the caries status of 214 teeth by serial sectioning and microscopy after caries diagnosis using four methods. Two hundred and fourteen extracted human teeth with varying degrees of caries were mounted in the jaws of nine training manikins. All tooth surfaces were examined and recorded for caries by four dentists using bitewing radiographs, fibre-optic transillumination (FOTI), mirror alone and a mirror and sharp probe on two separate occasions. Thereafter the teeth were serially sectioned and assessed microscopically for depth of caries lesion on a graded score of 0-7. This report assessed the diagnostic outcome of 2,183 observations for occlusal surfaces. Sound diagnoses predominated over unsound until caries was present in the inner half of dentine. Specificity was between 90% and 95% and sensitivity 26% and 50% depending on which diagnostic method was used and where the sound/unsound threshold was set. Negative and positive predictive values were similarly influenced and varied between 53% and 80% and 73% and 90%, respectively. Probit analysis showed no significant differences (P < 0.05) between examiners and diagnostic methods. Diagnosis of occlusal caries undertaken in an in vitro simulated clinical situation is inaccurate until the caries lesion extends deep into the dentine no matter which of the four methods was used.
本研究旨在通过连续切片和显微镜检查来验证在使用四种方法进行龋病诊断后214颗牙齿的龋病状况。将214颗患有不同程度龋病的拔除人类牙齿安装在九个训练模型的牙列中。由四位牙医在两个不同时间使用咬合翼片X光片、光纤透照法(FOTI)、仅用口镜以及口镜和尖锐探针检查并记录所有牙齿表面的龋病情况。此后,将牙齿进行连续切片,并在显微镜下以0至7的分级评分评估龋病病变的深度。本报告评估了2183次咬合面观察的诊断结果。在龋病累及牙本质内半部分之前,正确诊断占主导。根据所使用的诊断方法以及健全/不健全阈值的设定位置,特异性在90%至95%之间,敏感性在26%至50%之间。阴性和阳性预测值也受到类似影响,分别在53%至80%和73%至90%之间变化。概率分析表明,检查者和诊断方法之间无显著差异(P < 0.05)。在体外模拟临床情况下进行的咬合面龋病诊断不准确,直到龋病病变深入牙本质,无论使用四种方法中的哪一种。