Suppr超能文献

哮喘婴儿的潮气量用力呼气:重复性和可逆性测试。

Tidal volume forced expiration in asthmatic infants: reproducibility and reversibility tests.

作者信息

Lagerstrand Lars, Ingemansson Maria, Bergström Sten Erik, Lidberg Karin, Hedlin Gunilla

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physiology, Section of Allergy, Huddinge University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Respiration. 2002;69(5):389-96. doi: 10.1159/000064019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The tidal volume forced expiration technique used in infants is considered as the first practical noninvasive method of assessing airway physiology in infants. However, its role has been discussed mainly due to the high variability of the derived parameters.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the reproducibility of a complete measurement with the tidal volume forced expiration technique in infants as measured by the maximal flow at FRC (V(max)FRC). A second aim was to evaluate the bronchial reversibility test in infant asthma.

METHODS

Thirty infants with asthma were investigated with the tidal volume forced expiration technique twice with 10 min in between and a third time 10 min after inhalation of terbutalin 0.5 mg.

RESULTS

The mean V(max)FRC in the first investigation was 285 ml.s(-1) (coefficient of variation 57%), unchanged in the second investigation and significantly lower than the mean predicted value of 404 ml.s(-1). The relative difference between the 2 investigations of V(max)FRC was mean 10.5% (SD 8.4) of the absolute V(max)FRC value and independent of the size of this V(max)FRC value. The 95% confidence interval for individual changes would then be up to 27% (mean + 2 SD). The infants with the lowest V(max)FRC percent predicted decreased further in V(max)FRC after inhalation of the bronchodilator (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The tidal volume forced expiration technique was able to measure flow at late expiration with the same reproducibility as seen with spirometry in adults, even if the flow was low. We found the technique acceptable for clinical practice and research, but the results from reversibility tests are difficult to interpret. A significant change of V(max)FRC would, however, be 27% or more.

摘要

背景

婴儿潮气量用力呼气技术被认为是评估婴儿气道生理学的首个实用非侵入性方法。然而,由于所推导参数的高度变异性,其作用一直存在争议。

目的

本研究旨在评估采用潮气量用力呼气技术对婴儿进行完整测量的可重复性,通过功能残气量时的最大流速(V(max)FRC)来衡量。第二个目的是评估婴儿哮喘中的支气管可逆性试验。

方法

对30名哮喘婴儿采用潮气量用力呼气技术进行了两次检查,两次检查间隔10分钟,在吸入0.5毫克特布他林10分钟后进行了第三次检查。

结果

首次检查时的平均V(max)FRC为285毫升·秒⁻¹(变异系数57%),第二次检查时未变,且显著低于404毫升·秒⁻¹的平均预测值。两次V(max)FRC检查之间的相对差异平均为绝对V(max)FRC值的10.5%(标准差8.4),且与该V(max)FRC值的大小无关。个体变化的95%置信区间则高达27%(平均值 + 2标准差)。吸入支气管扩张剂后,预测V(max)FRC百分比最低的婴儿其V(max)FRC进一步下降(p < 0.05)。

结论

潮气量用力呼气技术能够测量呼气末期的流速,其可重复性与成人肺活量测定相同,即使流速较低。我们发现该技术在临床实践和研究中是可接受的,但可逆性试验的结果难以解释。然而,V(max)FRC的显著变化应为27%或更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验