Wuensch Karl L, Campbell Matthew W, Kesler Frederick C, Moore Charles H
Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4353, USA.
J Soc Psychol. 2002 Oct;142(5):587-600. doi: 10.1080/00224540209603920.
White (N = 161) and Black (N = 152) college students served as mock jurors in a simulated civil case in which a female plaintiff accused a male defendant of sexual harassment. The authors experimentally manipulated the race (Black or White) of the litigants and asked the mock jurors to decide whether the defendant was guilty; to rate the certainty of their belief in the defendant's guilt; and, when they judged the defendant guilty, to recommend an award to the plaintiff. Mock jurors of both races tended to favor litigants of their own race and their own gender. Racial bias was highest among White male jurors and lowest among White female jurors.
161名白人大学生和152名黑人大学生在一场模拟民事案件中担任模拟陪审员,案件中女性原告指控男性被告性骚扰。作者通过实验操纵了诉讼当事人的种族(黑人或白人),并要求模拟陪审员判定被告是否有罪;对他们认定被告有罪的确定性进行评分;并且,当他们判定被告有罪时,为原告推荐赔偿金额。两个种族的模拟陪审员都倾向于偏袒同种族和同性别的诉讼当事人。白人男性陪审员的种族偏见最高,白人女性陪审员的种族偏见最低。