Suppr超能文献

模拟陪审员在评估一起性骚扰案件时所做决定中的种族偏见。

Racial bias in decisions made by mock jurors evaluating a case of sexual harassment.

作者信息

Wuensch Karl L, Campbell Matthew W, Kesler Frederick C, Moore Charles H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858-4353, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2002 Oct;142(5):587-600. doi: 10.1080/00224540209603920.

Abstract

White (N = 161) and Black (N = 152) college students served as mock jurors in a simulated civil case in which a female plaintiff accused a male defendant of sexual harassment. The authors experimentally manipulated the race (Black or White) of the litigants and asked the mock jurors to decide whether the defendant was guilty; to rate the certainty of their belief in the defendant's guilt; and, when they judged the defendant guilty, to recommend an award to the plaintiff. Mock jurors of both races tended to favor litigants of their own race and their own gender. Racial bias was highest among White male jurors and lowest among White female jurors.

摘要

161名白人大学生和152名黑人大学生在一场模拟民事案件中担任模拟陪审员,案件中女性原告指控男性被告性骚扰。作者通过实验操纵了诉讼当事人的种族(黑人或白人),并要求模拟陪审员判定被告是否有罪;对他们认定被告有罪的确定性进行评分;并且,当他们判定被告有罪时,为原告推荐赔偿金额。两个种族的模拟陪审员都倾向于偏袒同种族和同性别的诉讼当事人。白人男性陪审员的种族偏见最高,白人女性陪审员的种族偏见最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验