Jones-correa M
Int Migr Rev. 1998 Summer;32(2):326-49.
"Building on arguments made by Grasmuck and Pessar (1991), Hardy-Fanta (1993), and Hondagneu-Sotelo (1994), among others, this article makes the case for a gendered understanding of immigrant political socialization. Looking at recent Latin American immigrants to New York City, the article argues that immigrant Latino men are more likely to favor continuity in patterns of socialization and organization, and immigrant Latinas are more likely to favor change. This finding helps bridge theoretical and empirical literatures in immigration studies, applying the logic of gender-differentiated decisionmaking to the area of immigrant political socialization and behavior."
基于格拉斯穆克和佩萨尔(1991年)、哈迪-范塔(1993年)、洪达涅乌-索特洛(1994年)等人提出的观点,本文论证了对移民政治社会化进行性别化理解的必要性。通过研究近期纽约市的拉丁裔移民,本文认为,移民拉丁裔男性更倾向于维持社会化和组织模式的连续性,而移民拉丁裔女性则更倾向于改变。这一发现有助于弥合移民研究中的理论和实证文献,将性别差异决策的逻辑应用于移民政治社会化和行为领域。