Plowman P
Dev Pract. 2000 May;10(2):189-203. doi: 10.1080/09614520050010223.
By exploring two approaches to organizational change, gender and organizational development (OD), the author argues that OD is flawed since it perpetuates existing gender inequalities by failing to address them. By contrast, the gender approach brings change both for women and for men and is contextualized in a broader agenda of social transformation. Analysis of how power is gendered is the critical starting point. While gender is not disconnected from other forms of oppression--such as race and class--special attention needs to be given to gender because experience has shown it gets lost. This article seeks to contribute to breaking new ground in theory and practice in order to promote organizations that are both equitable and effective.
通过探讨组织变革、性别与组织发展(OD)的两种方法,作者认为组织发展存在缺陷,因为它未能解决现有的性别不平等问题,从而使这些不平等永久化。相比之下,性别方法为女性和男性都带来了变革,并融入了更广泛的社会转型议程之中。对权力如何性别化的分析是关键的出发点。虽然性别与其他形式的压迫(如种族和阶级)并非毫无关联,但需要特别关注性别,因为经验表明它容易被忽视。本文旨在为理论和实践开拓新领域做出贡献,以促进既公平又有效的组织发展。