Feeny D, Berkes F, Mccay B J, Acheson J M
Hum Ecol. 1990 Mar;18(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00889070.
The authors take up the hypothesis originally proposed by Garrett Hardin that resources held in common, such as oceans, rivers, air, and parklands, are bound to be subject to massive degradation. Specifically, they "examine the accumulated evidence pertaining to common-property resource management and provide a critique of the conventional theory expounded by Hardin." They conclude that recent evidence suggests that users of such resources are able to restrict access to them and establish rules among themselves for their sustainable use.
作者们探讨了加勒特·哈丁最初提出的假说,即诸如海洋、河流、空气和公共绿地等公共资源必然会遭受大规模退化。具体而言,他们“审视了与公共资源管理相关的累积证据,并对哈丁阐述的传统理论进行了批判”。他们得出结论,近期证据表明,此类资源的使用者能够限制对这些资源的获取,并自行制定可持续利用资源的规则。