Wolter B F, Ellis M, Curtis S E, Parr E N, Webel D M
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2002 Sep;80(9):2241-6. doi: 10.2527/2002.8092241x.
Two studies were carried out with the same group of pigs within a wean-to-finish system. In Study 1 (weaning to wk 8 postweaning), the effect of feeder-trough space in pens that were double-stocked on pig growth was evaluated. In Study 2 (end of wk 8 to 112 +/- 1.5 kg BW), the effect of variation in pig BW within a pen on growth was investigated. In Study 1, a randomized block design was used to compare two feeder-trough space treatments (Double [4 cm/pig] vs Control [2 cm/pig]). Pigs (n = 1,728) were randomly allocated at weaning (5.4 +/- 0.01 kg BW; 16 d of age) to mixed-sex pens (8 pens/treatment) of 108 pigs/pen on the basis of BW. Floor-space (0.30 m2/pig) and drinker allocation (13 pigs/drinker) were the same for both treatments. Two six-place (35 cm/place) feeders were positioned together in the center of each pen and were accessible from both sides. For the Double treatment, both feeders contained feed, whereas for the Control only one feeder contained feed. In Study 2, a randomized block design was used to compare three BW/variation in BW treatments: 1) Heavy BW/Low variation, 2) Light BW/Low variation, and 3) Mixed BW/Normal variation. The double-stocked pens of pigs from within previous feeder-trough space treatment were split into two groups of 54 pigs (equal sex ratio) having either high or low BW variation within pen. Pigs had free access to feed and water throughout the studies. In Study 1, doubling feeder-trough space did not affect (P > 0.05) pig growth from weaning to the end of wk 6. From wk 6 to 8, pigs on the Double treatment compared to the Control treatment had higher (P < 0.05) ADG and were heavier (P < 0.05), but had similar (P > 0.05) ADFI and gain:feed ratio. In Study 2, pen-BW treatment did not impact (P > 0.05) ADG or gain:feed ratio; however, Heavy/Low had greater (P < 0.01) ADFI than Light/Low with Mixed/Normal being intermediate for ADFI. At 112 kg BW, CV of BW within a pen was similar (P > 0.05) across treatments; however, days to market BW was greater (P < 0.001) for Light/Low than Heavy/ Low with Mixed/Normal being intermediate. In summary, increasing feeder-trough space from 2 to 4 cm per pig increased daily gain after wk 6 postweaning in double-stocked pens of pigs; however, sorting pigs on the basis of BW when splitting pens did not impact growth rate or variation in BW within a pen at market BW.
在一个断奶至育肥系统中,对同一组猪进行了两项研究。在研究1(断奶至断奶后第8周)中,评估了双栏饲养栏中采食槽空间对猪生长的影响。在研究2(第8周末至体重112±1.5千克)中,研究了栏内猪体重差异对生长的影响。在研究1中,采用随机区组设计比较两种采食槽空间处理方式(双倍[4厘米/头]与对照[2厘米/头])。猪(n = 1728)在断奶时(体重5.4±0.01千克;16日龄)根据体重随机分配到混合性别栏(每个处理8栏),每栏108头猪。两种处理的地面空间(0.30平方米/头)和饮水器配置(13头猪/个饮水器)相同。两个六位(35厘米/位)的饲槽一起放置在每个栏的中央,两侧均可使用。对于双倍处理,两个饲槽都装有饲料,而对照处理只有一个饲槽装有饲料。在研究2中,采用随机区组设计比较三种体重/体重差异处理方式:1)重体重/低差异,2)轻体重/低差异,3)混合体重/正常差异。将先前采食槽空间处理中的双栏饲养猪分成两组,每组54头猪(性别比例相等),栏内体重差异有高有低。在整个研究过程中,猪可自由采食和饮水。在研究1中,将采食槽空间加倍对断奶至第6周末的猪生长没有影响(P>0.05)。从第6周到第8周,与对照处理相比,双倍处理的猪平均日增重更高(P<0.05)且体重更重(P<0.05),但平均日采食量和料重比相似(P>0.05)。在研究2中,栏内体重处理对平均日增重或料重比没有影响(P>0.05);然而,重体重/低差异组的平均日采食量比轻体重/低差异组更大(P<0.01),混合体重/正常差异组的平均日采食量介于两者之间。体重达到112千克时,各处理栏内体重的变异系数相似(P>0.05);然而,轻体重/低差异组达到上市体重的天数比重体重/低差异组更多(P<0.001),混合体重/正常差异组介于两者之间。总之,在双栏饲养的猪中,将每头猪的采食槽空间从2厘米增加到4厘米可提高断奶后第6周后的日增重;然而,分栏时根据体重对猪进行分类对上市体重时栏内猪的生长速度或体重差异没有影响。