Sharma Savitri, Kunimoto Derek Y, Gopinathan Usha, Athmanathan Sreedharan, Garg Prashant, Rao Gullapalli N
Jhaveri Microbiology Center, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Cornea. 2002 Oct;21(7):643-7. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200210000-00002.
To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of Gram and potassium hydroxide with calcofluor white (KOH+CFW) stains in the diagnosis of early and advanced microbial keratitis, a retrospective analysis of comparative data from a prospectively collected database was done.
Patients with nonviral microbial keratitis seen at L.V. Prasad Eye Institute between February 1991 and December 1998 were included in the study. The type of bacteria seen on Gram stain was determined from 251 corneal scrapings from patients with early keratitis and 841 corneal scrapings from patients with advanced keratitis. The presence of fungi in corneal scrapings was determined by KOH+CFW stain of 114 and 363 scrapings from patients with early and advanced keratitis, respectively. The smear findings were compared with culture results to analyze specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of the staining techniques.
The sensitivity of Gram stain in the detection of bacteria was 36.0% in early and 40.9% in advanced keratitis cases; however, the specificity was higher in both groups (84.9% and 87.1%, respectively). Comparatively, the sensitivity and specificity of fungal detection were higher using KOH+CFW in early (61.1% and 99.0%, respectively) as well as advanced keratitis (87.7% and 83.7%, respectively). Predictive values were high for KOH+CFW in fungus detection, while they were poor for Gram stain in bacteria detection. In advanced keratitis cases, the false positives were higher in fungal detection (16.3%) than in bacterial detection (10.3%), while the false negatives were significantly higher in bacterial detection compared with fungal detection (59.1% versus 12.3%, p< 0.0001). In early keratitis, on the other hand, both false positives and false negatives for bacterial detection were significantly higher than fungal detection.
Decisions can reliably be based on KOH+CFW stain of corneal scrapings for initiation of antifungal therapy in mycotic keratitis. The results of Gram stain, on the other hand, have limited value in therapeutic decisions for bacterial keratitis. Therefore, the search for a better modality for early and efficient diagnosis of bacterial keratitis needs to continue.
为确定革兰氏染色及氢氧化钾与荧光增白剂(KOH+CFW)染色在早期和晚期微生物性角膜炎诊断中的敏感性、特异性及预测价值,我们对前瞻性收集数据库中的比较数据进行了回顾性分析。
纳入1991年2月至1998年12月在L.V.普拉萨德眼科研究所就诊的非病毒性微生物性角膜炎患者。从251例早期角膜炎患者的角膜刮片中及841例晚期角膜炎患者的角膜刮片中确定革兰氏染色所见细菌类型。分别对114例早期角膜炎患者和363例晚期角膜炎患者的角膜刮片进行KOH+CFW染色,以确定角膜刮片中真菌的存在情况。将涂片结果与培养结果进行比较,以分析染色技术的特异性、敏感性及预测价值。
革兰氏染色检测细菌在早期角膜炎病例中的敏感性为36.0%,在晚期角膜炎病例中为40.9%;然而,两组的特异性均较高(分别为84.9%和87.1%)。相比之下,使用KOH+CFW检测真菌,在早期角膜炎(分别为61.1%和99.0%)及晚期角膜炎(分别为87.7%和83.7%)中的敏感性和特异性均更高。KOH+CFW在真菌检测中的预测价值较高,而革兰氏染色在细菌检测中的预测价值较低。在晚期角膜炎病例中,真菌检测的假阳性率(16.3%)高于细菌检测(10.3%),而细菌检测的假阴性率显著高于真菌检测(59.1%对12.3%,p<0.0001)。另一方面,在早期角膜炎中,细菌检测的假阳性和假阴性均显著高于真菌检测。
对于霉菌性角膜炎,基于角膜刮片的KOH+CFW染色可可靠地用于启动抗真菌治疗的决策。另一方面,革兰氏染色结果在细菌性角膜炎治疗决策中的价值有限。因此,需要继续寻找更好的早期高效诊断细菌性角膜炎的方法。