Marusch Frank, Koch Andreas, Schmidt Uwe, Geibetaler Sven, Dralle Henning, Saeger Hans-Detlev, Wolff Stefanie, Nestler Gerd, Pross Matthias, Gastinger Ingo, Lippert Hans
Institute for Quality Management in Operative Medicine at the Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Sep;45(9):1164-71. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6384-9.
Anastomotic leakage is a major problem in colorectal surgery and in particular in operations for low rectal cancer. The present study investigates the question whether a protective stoma can reduce the (clinical and radiologic) anastomotic leakage rate and/or the rate of leakage requiring surgery.
The investigation took the form of a prospective multicenter study involving 75 German hospitals and was performed between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 1999. A comparison was made of the postoperative results of procedures performed with and those performed without a protective stoma in patients undergoing low anterior rectal resection. In addition, logistic regression using the target criteria, overall anastomotic leakage and anastomotic leakage requiring surgery, was applied.
Among the 3,695 operations performed for carcinoma of the rectum or colon, 482 were low anterior resections. In 334 patients (69.3 percent) no protective stoma was constructed, whereas 148 (30.7 percent) received such protection. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and body mass index were identical in both groups. In the group receiving a protective stoma, however, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was more common, the tumors were lower-and thus the total mesorectal excision rate higher, the intraoperative complication rate was higher, and the duration of the operation was longer. The differences were all significant. The major criterion (overall anastomotic leakage rate) was identical in the two groups, but the rate of leakage requiring surgery was significantly lower in patients receiving a protective stoma (p = 0.028). The logistic regression revealed that use of a protective stoma is a predictor of protection against anastomotic leakage requiring surgery. The distance of the tumor from the anal verge and the duration of the operation are further predictors.
The particular benefit of a covering stoma is reduction in the rate of leaks requiring surgery and thus in the severe consequences of an anastomotic leakage.
吻合口漏是结直肠手术中的一个主要问题,尤其是在低位直肠癌手术中。本研究探讨了保护性造口能否降低(临床和影像学)吻合口漏发生率和/或需要手术处理的漏出率这一问题。
本研究采用前瞻性多中心研究形式,涉及75家德国医院,研究时间为1999年1月1日至1999年12月31日。对接受低位前切除术的患者中,有保护性造口和无保护性造口手术的术后结果进行了比较。此外,还应用了以总体吻合口漏和需要手术的吻合口漏为目标标准的逻辑回归分析。
在为直肠癌或结肠癌实施的3695例手术中,有482例为低位前切除术。334例患者(69.3%)未行保护性造口,而148例(30.7%)接受了这种保护措施。两组患者的年龄、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级和体重指数相同。然而,在接受保护性造口的组中,新辅助放化疗更为常见,肿瘤位置更低,因此直肠系膜全切除率更高,术中并发症发生率更高,手术时间更长。这些差异均具有统计学意义。两组的主要标准(总体吻合口漏发生率)相同,但接受保护性造口的患者中需要手术的漏出率显著更低(p = 0.028)。逻辑回归分析显示,使用保护性造口是防止需要手术的吻合口漏的一个预测因素。肿瘤距肛缘的距离和手术时间是另外的预测因素。
覆盖性造口的特别益处在于降低需要手术的漏出率,从而减少吻合口漏的严重后果。