Pituch-Noworolska A
Katedra Immunologii Klinicznej i Patologii Zakład Immunologii Klinicznej Polsko-Amerykańskiego Instytutu Pediatrii Wydziału Lekarskiego, ul. Wielicka 265 30-663 Kraków.
Folia Med Cracov. 2001;42(3):5-80.
The atypical immunophenotype (expression of determinant from the another cell lines than line of origin) of acute leukaemia blast cells are noted in a part of cases. The characteristics and classification of atypical immunophenotypes are not unified and the clinical significance is not yet fully described. The purpose of the study was: precise description of atypical immunophenotypes and analysis of their frequency in different types of acute leukaemia, analysis of association between expression of atypical immunophenotypes and the level of initial leukocytosis, percentage of blast cells in peripheral blood, expression of CD34, analysis of frequency of multidrug resistance molecule (MDR) expression and association between MDR and immunophenotypes of leukaemia cells, analysis of association between atypical immunophenotypes and proliferation, secretion of cytokines (IL-6, TNF) and spontaneous apoptosis of leukaemia cells, analysis of association between atypical immunophenotypes and sensitivity to induction therapy. The bone marrow samples used for routine diagnosis were the basic source of leukaemia cells for the study. The morphological examination and the immunophenotypes of leukaemia cells were done for classification of leukaemia. The immunophenotype and the expression of MDR determination was performed with flow cytometry after staining the cells with monoclonal antibodies (directly labelled) for CD determinants and MDR. The spontaneous proliferation of leukaemia cells was studied with 3H-Thymidine uptake after 3-days culture in vitro. The type of proliferation (autocrine, paracrine) was defined based on comparison of shorter (3-days) and longer (6-days) culture of leukaemia cells. The percentage of apoptotic leukaemia cells was analysed with flow cytometry after staining of leukaemia cells with propidium iodide in subdiploidal region of DNA profile. The secretion of cytokines (IL-6 and TNF) was determined by ELISA technique in supernatants of leukaemia cells cultured for 24 hr in vitro. The biological activity of TNF was determined in the bioassay using L929 mouse cells line. The effect of induction therapy was estimated base on time of cytoreduction in peripheral blood and time of reaching the haematological remission in bone marrow. The study included 230 children with acute leukaemia: lymphoblastic (ALL)--189 children (ALL-proB--19, common ALL--139, ALL-B--5 and ALL-T--26) and myeloid (AML)--34 children. Moreover, into the study 2 cases of acute undifferentiated leukaemia (AUL) and 3--acute mixed lineage leukaemia (AMLL) and 2--biphenotypic leukaemia were included. The all studies of leukaemia cells had been done before the therapy was installed. Basing on the assay of immunophenotypes the following forms of atypical immunophenotypes were distinguished: immunophenotype incomplete, hyperexpression of determinants, asynchronic immunophenotype, coexpression of determinants from the other line than origin of leukaemia cells, balanced expression of determinants from two cells lines (biphenotypic leukaemia) and three cells lines (mixed lineage leukaemia). The atypical immunophenotypes were observed in: 21.1% ALL-proB cases, 34.5% common ALL cases, 42.3% ALL-T and 58.8% AML. The most common form of atypical immunophenotypes was coexpression of determinants from the other cell line. There were no associations between atypical immunophenotypes and the level of initial leukocytosis and percentage of blast cells in peripheral blood. The expression of CD34, recognised as the one of markers of poorer prognosis, was analysed regarding the leukaemia type and immunophenotype of leukaemia cells. The lowest frequency of CD34 expression was noted in ALL-T (28.5%), the highest one in common ALL (62.3%). The significant association between frequency of CD34 and atypical immunophenotypes was observed in AML and ALL-T. Moreover, in common ALL the expression of CD34 was significantly higher when myeloid determinants were present on common ALL cells (common ALL + My) in comparison to coexpression of lymphoid determinants (common ALL + Ly). The frequency of MDR expression (cases with more than 10% of MDR positive cells) was in range between 16.6% in ALL-proB and 78.9% in AML. The mean percentage of cells expressing MDR was low in ALL-proB (10.7%) and high in ALL-T (39.6%). In ALL the atypical immunophenotype was associated with expression of MDR whereas in AML this association did not appear. The common ALL + My leukaemia cells showed higher ability to proliferation in vitro compare with common ALL without atypical immunophenotype. The opposite results were observed in AML. AML leukaemia cells with coexpression of lymphoid determinants (AML + Ly) showed lower proliferation in vitro than AML without atypical immunophenotype. The autocrine type of proliferation was observed frequently in AML (35.3% of cases) than in ALL (14.2%). This type of spontaneous proliferation was observed only when the leukaemia cells without changes in immunophenotype had been cultured. The low level in common ALL and high in AML of spontaneous release of IL-6 and TNF were noted. AML leukaemia cells without changes in immunophenotype released significantly higher amount of these cytokines than AML cells with atypical immunophenotypes (AML + Ly). The above observations suggested that coexpression of myeloid determinants in ALL and lymphoid determinants in AML were leading to changes of some biological properties of these cells. The ALL + My leukaemia cells behaved similarly to myeloid leukaemia cells, while AML + Ly cells showed features of lymphoid leukaemia cells. The common ALL and AML leukaemia cells with atypical immunophenotype showed higher percentage of apoptotic cells (16.1% and 16.9% respectively) comparing to common ALL and AML without changes in immunophenotype (9.0% and 9.2% respectively). The weak negative association of MDR expression and apoptosis suggested the indirect inhibiting influence of MDR on ability of cells to undergo into the apoptosis process. In common ALL and AML with typical immunophenotype of leukaemia cells and ALL-T the level of apoptosis was associated positively with the spontaneous proliferation, whereas this relation was negative in AML with atypical immunophenotype. There were no differences of the time of cytoreduction of leukaemia cells in peripheral blood in B cell origin ALL and AML with or without changes in immunophenotype of blastic cells. In ALL-T + My the time of cytoreduction was significantly longer. However, the expression of CD10 in ALL-T had no effect on cytoreduction time. The expression of MDR in ALL-T with typical immunophenotype was independent marker associated with elongation of cytoreduction time. The time of reaching the complete haematological remission was analysed in 186 children with ALL (ALL-proB--18 children, common ALL--137 children, ALL-T--26) and only 19 children with AML. The longest period of time for reaching the remission was observed in AML, shortest--in ALL-T. In common ALL and ALL-T the expression of myeloid determinants was associated with significant elongation of time of reaching the remission. In the majority of AML cases with coexpression lymphoid determinants, the complete remission was reached. The time needed for the reaching of remission was similar in AML with or without coexpression of lymphoid determinants. The results of this study suggest that coexpression of determinants from the other cell line modify the biological properties of leukaemia cells into the cells from the line of origin of these additional determinants. In ALL the combined expression of MDR and atypical immunophenotype of leukaemia cells were associated with poorer response to induction therapy. In AML the combined expression of CD34 and atypical immunophenotype were associated with response to induction therapy by reaching the complete remission, but without any influence on the time of reaching this remission. The results of analysis of cytoreduction time and time of reaching the remission improved the usefulness of these parameters for the estimation of response to the induction therapy. The clinical importance of these observations consist in characterisation of leukaemia cells potentially resistant to the induction therapy what may suggest the modification and individualization of the induction therapy.
部分急性白血病原始细胞存在非典型免疫表型(表达源自起源细胞系以外其他细胞系的决定簇)。非典型免疫表型的特征和分类尚未统一,其临床意义也尚未完全阐明。本研究的目的是:精确描述非典型免疫表型并分析其在不同类型急性白血病中的频率,分析非典型免疫表型表达与初始白细胞增多水平、外周血原始细胞百分比、CD34表达之间的关联,分析多药耐药分子(MDR)表达频率以及MDR与白血病细胞免疫表型之间的关联,分析非典型免疫表型与白血病细胞增殖、细胞因子(IL-6、TNF)分泌及自发凋亡之间的关联,分析非典型免疫表型与诱导治疗敏感性之间的关联。用于常规诊断的骨髓样本是本研究白血病细胞的基本来源。通过白血病细胞的形态学检查和免疫表型分析进行白血病分类。用针对CD决定簇和MDR的单克隆抗体(直接标记)对细胞进行染色后,采用流式细胞术检测免疫表型和MDR的表达。体外培养3天后,通过3H-胸腺嘧啶核苷摄取研究白血病细胞的自发增殖。根据白血病细胞较短(3天)和较长(6天)培养的比较来确定增殖类型(自分泌、旁分泌)。用碘化丙啶对白血病细胞进行染色后,在DNA图谱的亚二倍体区域通过流式细胞术分析凋亡白血病细胞的百分比。采用ELISA技术测定体外培养24小时的白血病细胞上清液中细胞因子(IL-6和TNF)的分泌。使用L929小鼠细胞系通过生物测定法测定TNF的生物活性。根据外周血细胞减少时间和骨髓达到血液学缓解的时间评估诱导治疗的效果。本研究纳入了230例急性白血病患儿:淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)——189例(proB-ALL——19例、普通ALL——139例、B-ALL——5例和T-ALL——26例)和髓细胞白血病(AML)——34例。此外,还纳入了2例急性未分化白血病(AUL)、3例急性混合谱系白血病(AMLL)和2例双表型白血病。所有白血病细胞的研究均在开始治疗前进行。根据免疫表型分析,区分出以下几种非典型免疫表型形式:免疫表型不完全、决定簇过度表达、异步免疫表型、源自白血病细胞起源以外其他细胞系的决定簇共表达、来自两个细胞系(双表型白血病)和三个细胞系(混合谱系白血病)的决定簇平衡表达。在以下病例中观察到非典型免疫表型:21.1%的proB-ALL病例、34.5%的普通ALL病例、42.3%的T-ALL病例和58.8%的AML病例。最常见的非典型免疫表型形式是源自其他细胞系的决定簇共表达。非典型免疫表型与初始白细胞增多水平和外周血原始细胞百分比之间无关联。针对白血病类型和白血病细胞免疫表型分析了被认为是预后较差标志物之一的CD34的表达。T-ALL中CD34表达频率最低(28.5%),普通ALL中最高(62.3%)。在AML和T-ALL中观察到CD34频率与非典型免疫表型之间存在显著关联。此外,在普通ALL中,当普通ALL细胞上存在髓细胞决定簇(普通ALL+My)时,CD34的表达明显高于淋巴细胞决定簇共表达(普通ALL+Ly)的情况。MDR表达频率(MDR阳性细胞超过10%的病例)在proB-ALL中为16.6%,在AML中为78.9%。表达MDR的细胞平均百分比在proB-ALL中较低(10.7%),在T-ALL中较高(39.6%)。在ALL中,非典型免疫表型与MDR表达相关,而在AML中这种关联未出现。与无非典型免疫表型的普通ALL相比,普通ALL+My白血病细胞在体外显示出更高的增殖能力。在AML中观察到相反的结果。与无非典型免疫表型的AML相比,共表达淋巴细胞决定簇的AML(AML+Ly)白血病细胞在体外增殖较低。AML中自分泌型增殖(35.3%的病例)比ALL(14.2%)中更常见。仅在免疫表型无变化的白血病细胞培养时观察到这种自发增殖类型。普通ALL中IL-6和TNF的自发释放水平较低,AML中较高。免疫表型无变化的AML白血病细胞比具有非典型免疫表型的AML细胞(AML+Ly)释放的这些细胞因子量明显更高。上述观察结果表明,ALL中髓细胞决定簇的共表达和AML中淋巴细胞决定簇的共表达导致这些细胞某些生物学特性的改变。ALL+My白血病细胞的行为类似于髓细胞白血病细胞,而AML+Ly细胞表现出淋巴细胞白血病细胞的特征。与免疫表型无变化的普通ALL和AML相比,具有非典型免疫表型的普通ALL和AML白血病细胞显示出更高的凋亡细胞百分比(分别为16.1%和16.9%)(分别为9.0%和9.2%)。MDR表达与凋亡之间的弱负相关表明MDR对细胞进入凋亡过程的能力具有间接抑制作用。在白血病细胞具有典型免疫表型的普通ALL和AML以及T-ALL中,凋亡水平与自发增殖呈正相关,而在具有非典型免疫表型的AML中这种关系为负相关。B细胞起源的ALL和AML中,白血病细胞在外周血细胞减少时间方面,无论原始细胞免疫表型有无变化均无差异。在T-ALL+My中,细胞减少时间明显更长。然而,T-ALL中CD10的表达对细胞减少时间无影响。具有典型免疫表型的T-ALL中MDR的表达是与细胞减少时间延长相关的独立标志物。分析了186例ALL患儿(proB-ALL——18例、普通ALL——137例、T-ALL——26例)和仅19例AML患儿达到完全血液学缓解的时间。达到缓解的最长时间在AML中观察到,最短在T-ALL中。在普通ALL和T-ALL中,髓细胞决定簇的表达与达到缓解的时间显著延长相关。在大多数共表达淋巴细胞决定簇的AML病例中,达到了完全缓解。有无共表达淋巴细胞决定簇的AML达到缓解所需时间相似。本研究结果表明,源自其他细胞系的决定簇共表达将白血病细胞的生物学特性改变为源自这些额外决定簇细胞系的细胞特性。在ALL中,白血病细胞MDR与非典型免疫表型的联合表达与诱导治疗反应较差相关。在AML中,CD34与非典型免疫表型的联合表达与通过达到完全缓解对诱导治疗的反应相关,但对达到该缓解的时间无任何影响。细胞减少时间和达到缓解时间的分析结果提高了这些参数对诱导治疗反应评估的有用性。这些观察结果的临床重要性在于对可能对诱导治疗耐药的白血病细胞进行表征,这可能提示诱导治疗的调整和个体化。