Bosco Domenico, Palermo Simona, Mason Giovanna, Tedeschi Rosemarie, Marzachì Cristina, Boccardo Guido
Di.Va.P.R.A., Entomologia e Zoologia applicata all'ambiente Carlo Vidano, Università degli Studi di Torino, Grugliasco, Italy.
Mol Biotechnol. 2002 Sep;22(1):9-18. doi: 10.1385/MB:22:1:009.
DNA extraction and storage methods have been evaluated with laboratory-reared leafhoppers and/or field-collected leafhoppers and psyllids. Detection of four different phytopathogenic phytoplasmas, belonging to three taxonomic groups, has been achieved by several direct or nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods with such DNA extracts. Reactions differed in both the 16/23S ribosomal primer pairs used and the specific assay and cycling conditions. Merits and possible hindrances of the various primer pairs, in relation to insect DNA extracts, are discussed. However, identification of the phytoplasma(s) necessarily relied on comparison of the polymorphism in length of the amplified DNA fragments obtained by restriction with appropriate endonucleases. Endonuclease digestion is crucial for determining the identity (subgroup affiliation) of phytoplasmas of the same groups that can be carried by an individual vector.
已使用实验室饲养的叶蝉和/或田间采集的叶蝉及木虱对DNA提取和储存方法进行了评估。通过几种直接或巢式聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法,利用此类DNA提取物检测到了属于三个分类群的四种不同的植物致病植原体。反应在所用的16/23S核糖体引物对以及特定检测方法和循环条件方面存在差异。讨论了各种引物对相对于昆虫DNA提取物的优点和可能存在的障碍。然而,植原体的鉴定必然依赖于对通过用适当的核酸内切酶进行限制性消化获得的扩增DNA片段长度多态性的比较。核酸内切酶消化对于确定可由单个载体携带的同一组植原体的身份(亚组归属)至关重要。