Scheule Albertus M, Zimmerman Grenith J, Johnston Joyce K, Razzouk Anees J, Gundry Steven R, Bailey Leonard L
Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, and Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, Calif, USA.
Circulation. 2002 Sep 24;106(12 Suppl 1):I163-7.
Utilizing donor hearts with prolonged graft ischemia may extend the donor pool.
The medical records of 363 infants and children, aged 1 day to 17 years, transplanted at Loma Linda University between November 1985 and March 2001, were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen children received organs with prolonged ischemic times (>8 hours)(PIT) compared with 14 with short ischemic times (< or =90 minutes)(SIT). There were no significant differences when comparing donors for gender, age, weight, cause of death, or duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Preoperative donor shortening fraction (%), as determined by echocardiography, was significantly higher in the SIT group (44.5 versus 36.5%; P=0.006). There were no significant differences between PIT and SIT recipients when comparing age at transplant, weight at transplant, waiting time, weight mismatch, postoperative days on ventilator, duration of inotropic support, and hospital stay. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly longer in the PIT group (140.5 versus 80.5 minute; P=0.001). Median length of follow-up for both groups was approximately 5 years. Five grafts were lost in the PIT group; 7 were lost in the SIT group, with 1 early graft loss in each group. Significant posttransplant coronary artery disease was diagnosed in 2 recipients in each group (PIT: 80 and 42; SIT: 84 and 67 months posttransplant). There was no significant difference between groups in actuarial graft survival. Number of rejection episodes and hospital readmissions during the first posttransplantation year did not differ significantly between groups.
Late outcomes were not adversely affected by donor hearts preserved by single dose cold crystalloid cardioplegia with greater than 8 hours of cold ischemia.
使用移植器官缺血时间延长的供体心脏可能会扩大供体库。
回顾性分析了1985年11月至2001年3月在洛马林达大学接受移植的363例1天至17岁婴幼儿及儿童的病历。14例儿童接受了缺血时间延长(>8小时)(PIT)的器官,与之相比,14例接受了缺血时间短(≤90分钟)(SIT)的器官。在比较供体的性别、年龄、体重、死亡原因或心肺复苏持续时间时,无显著差异。经超声心动图测定,术前供体缩短分数(%)在SIT组显著更高(44.5对36.5%;P = 0.006)。在比较移植时年龄、移植时体重、等待时间、体重不匹配、术后呼吸机使用天数、血管活性药物支持持续时间和住院时间时,PIT组和SIT组受体之间无显著差异。PIT组体外循环时间显著更长(140.5对80.5分钟;P = 0.001)。两组的中位随访时间约为5年。PIT组有5例移植器官丢失;SIT组有7例丢失,每组各有1例早期移植器官丢失。每组各有2例受体被诊断出有显著的移植后冠状动脉疾病(PIT组:移植后80和42个月;SIT组:移植后84和67个月)。两组在移植器官存活概率方面无显著差异。移植后第一年的排斥反应次数和再次入院次数在两组之间无显著差异。
单剂量冷晶体心脏停搏液保存且冷缺血时间超过8小时的供体心脏,对后期结果没有不利影响。