Effect of maze procedure in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing valve replacement.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY

The study aim was to elucidate the impact of the maze procedure on late outcome after valve replacement.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2000, 241 patients underwent the maze procedure combined with valve replacement. Patients were allocated to three groups: aortic valve replacement (AVR/maze, n = 16); mitral valve replacement (MVR/maze, n = 148); and combined aortic and mitral valve replacement (DVR/maze, n = 77).

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 3.9 +/- 2.3 years. Hospital mortality was 0% in the AVR/maze group, 2.0% (n = 3) in the MVR/maze group, and 3.9% (n = 3) in the DVR/maze group. Elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF) at discharge was achieved in 74.3-75.9% of cases. Freedom from recurrence of AF/atrial flutter was 71.2% in the AVR/maze group, 68.2% in the MVR/maze group, and 64.0% in the DVR/maze group at five-year follow up. By multivariate analysis, risk factors for recurrence of AF/atrial flutter included preoperative enlarged left atrial dimension >70 mm, decreased postoperative fractional shortening <30%, and absence of postoperative left atrial contraction. Freedom from stroke was 93.6% in patients who achieved regular rhythm (normal sinus rhythm or junctional rhythm), and 80.9% in those with recurrence of AF at five years after surgery (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The combined maze procedure and valve replacement is safe and effective in selected patients. Restoration of regular rhythm significantly reduced the incidence of late stroke.