Friedman David S, Jampel Henry D, Lubomski Lisa H, Kempen John H, Quigley Harry, Congdon Nathan, Levkovitch-Verbin Hani, Robinson Karen A, Bass Eric B
Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2002 Oct;109(10):1902-13. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01267-8.
To assess short- and long-term control of intraocular pressure (IOP) with different surgical treatment strategies for coexisting cataract and glaucoma.
Systematic literature review and analysis.
We performed a search of the published literature to identify all eligible articles pertaining to the surgical management of coexisting cataract and glaucoma in adults. One investigator abstracted the content of each article onto a custom-designed form. A second investigator corroborated the findings. The evidence supporting different approaches was graded by consensus as good, fair, weak, or insufficient.
Short-term (24 hours or fewer) and long-term (more than 24 hours) IOP control.
The evidence was good that long-term IOP is lowered more by combined glaucoma and cataract operations than by cataract operations alone. On average, the IOP was 3 to 4 mmHg lower in the combined groups with fewer medications required. The evidence was weak that extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) alone results in short-term increase in IOP and was insufficient to determine the short-term impact of phacoemulsification cataract extraction (PECE) on IOP in glaucoma patients. The evidence was weak that short-term IOP control was better with ECCE or PECE combined with an incisional glaucoma procedure compared with ECCE or PECE alone. The evidence was also weak (but consistent) that long-term IOP is lowered by 2 to 4 mmHg after ECCE or PECE. Finally, there was weak evidence that combined PECE and trabeculectomy produces slightly worse long-term IOP control than trabeculectomy alone, and there was fair evidence that the same is true for ECCE combined with trabeculectomy.
There is strong evidence for better long-term control of IOP with combined glaucoma and cataract operations compared with cataract surgery alone. For other issues regarding surgical treatment strategies for cataract and glaucoma, the available evidence is limited or conflicting.
评估针对白内障与青光眼并存情况采用不同手术治疗策略时眼内压(IOP)的短期和长期控制情况。
系统文献综述与分析。
我们检索已发表的文献,以识别所有与成人白内障与青光眼并存情况的手术管理相关的合格文章。一名研究人员将每篇文章的内容摘要到定制设计的表格上。另一名研究人员证实了这些发现。支持不同方法的证据经共识分级为良好、中等、薄弱或不足。
短期(24小时或更短时间)和长期(超过24小时)的IOP控制情况。
有充分证据表明,与单纯白内障手术相比,青光眼与白内障联合手术能更有效地降低长期IOP。平均而言,联合手术组的IOP低3至4 mmHg,所需药物更少。证据薄弱表明单纯囊外白内障摘除术(ECCE)会导致IOP短期升高,且不足以确定超声乳化白内障摘除术(PECE)对青光眼患者IOP的短期影响。证据薄弱表明,与单独的ECCE或PECE相比,ECCE或PECE联合切开性青光眼手术在短期IOP控制方面效果更好。证据也很薄弱(但一致)表明,ECCE或PECE后长期IOP可降低2至4 mmHg。最后,有薄弱证据表明,PECE联合小梁切除术产生略差于单独小梁切除术的长期IOP控制效果,且有中等证据表明ECCE联合小梁切除术也是如此。
有充分证据表明,与单纯白内障手术相比,青光眼与白内障联合手术能更好地长期控制IOP。对于白内障和青光眼手术治疗策略的其他问题,现有证据有限或相互矛盾。