Won Kim Sug, Pio Hong Joon, Kee Min Wan, Wan Seo Dong, Kyu Chung Yoon
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Oct;110(5):1240-6; discussion 1247-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200210000-00004.
Nasal bone fractures are the most common among facial fractures and are the third most common fractures in the human frame. Although many forms of treatment have been introduced, controversy regarding the optimal treatment still remains. Nasal bone fractures are complex, with significantly varying types that are often undermanaged in closed reduction procedures. The authors' experiences with nasal bone fractures have shown that the baseline for surgical intervention depends on the type of fracture and the method of maintenance after reduction, both of which have considerable impact on the final result. Therefore, it is very important and challenging to determine the proper method of reduction and maintenance. The periosteal covering plays an important role in the splinting action after closed reduction, but sagging, depression, and instability remain major complications in some cases. The authors devised a new method of accurate, firm stabilization of the fractured nasal bone by using external pins in those unfavorable fractures determined radiologically to gain optimal reduction and fixation. In the present study, fractures were grouped into favorable and unfavorable fractures, the latter being those that remained unstable or impacted even after reduction and thus needed open reduction. Unfavorable fractures were divided into four subclasses according to radiologic findings: (1) type I (frontal), including chip or tip fractures, which often depress the upper lateral cartilage and tend to sag after reduction; (2) type II (lateral), or laterally depressed segmental fractures with a lateral shift of the arch in fragments or as a unit; (3) type III (mixed), or type II with septal involvement; and (4) type IV (complex), including open or multiple comminuted fractures. After an initial evaluation to determine the fracture type, closed reduction and external fixation were performed for types I, II, and III fractures and open reduction was performed for type IV fractures 5 to 7 days after the fracture. Closed reduction with the use of external pins was done in eight cases: type I (two), type II (four), and type III (two). The mean age of the patients was 27.8 years, and the average follow-up period was 11.7 months. Functional and aesthetic results were satisfactory. This new method for support and fixation is an alternative to the conventional closed reduction and a promising way to prevent secondary deformity.
鼻骨骨折是面部骨折中最常见的,也是人体骨骼中第三常见的骨折。尽管已经引入了多种治疗方法,但关于最佳治疗的争议仍然存在。鼻骨骨折情况复杂,骨折类型差异很大,在闭合复位手术中往往处理不当。作者在鼻骨骨折方面的经验表明,手术干预的基线取决于骨折类型和复位后的维持方法,这两者对最终结果都有相当大的影响。因此,确定合适的复位和维持方法非常重要且具有挑战性。骨膜覆盖在闭合复位后的夹板固定作用中起着重要作用,但在某些情况下,下垂、凹陷和不稳定仍然是主要并发症。作者设计了一种新方法,通过在经放射学确定为不利骨折的情况下使用外部钢针,对骨折的鼻骨进行精确、稳固的固定,以实现最佳复位和固定。在本研究中,骨折分为有利骨折和不利骨折,后者是指即使复位后仍不稳定或有嵌顿,因此需要切开复位的骨折。根据放射学表现,不利骨折分为四个亚类:(1)I型(额部),包括碎片或尖端骨折,这类骨折常使上外侧软骨凹陷,复位后容易下垂;(2)II型(外侧),即伴有碎片或整个弓形向外侧移位的外侧凹陷节段性骨折;(3)III型(混合型),即伴有鼻中隔受累的II型骨折;(4)IV型(复杂型),包括开放性或多发性粉碎性骨折。在初步评估确定骨折类型后,对I、II和III型骨折进行闭合复位和外固定,对IV型骨折在骨折后5至7天进行切开复位。使用外部钢针进行闭合复位的有8例:I型(2例)、II型(4例)和III型(2例)。患者的平均年龄为27.8岁,平均随访期为11.7个月。功能和美学效果令人满意。这种新的支撑和固定方法是传统闭合复位的一种替代方法,也是预防继发性畸形的一种有前景的方法。