Rother E, Cornel P, Ante A, Kleinert P, Brambach R
Darmstadt University of Technology, Institute WAR, Section Wastewater Technology, Germany.
Water Sci Technol. 2002;46(4-5):149-56.
The performance of two systems of semi-industrial up-flow biological aerated filters (BAF) with pre-denitrification followed by nitrification was studied and compared under various operating and loading conditions. The first system consisted of two separate reactors for the denitrification and the nitrification step, whereas in the second system the aerobic nitrification zone was packed on top of the anoxic denitrification zone in one reactor. The second system potentially offers substantial savings in investment costs and space requirements for a large scale treatment plant. Regarding the elimination of carbonaceous pollution and denitrification the systems did not show significant differences. However, nitrification in the combined system suffered from the mixing of different biocenosis by daily backwashing and was reduced to 50-70% of the separated system's performance. Factors such as oxygen concentration, raw water composition and loading rates affected both systems' nitrification rates in similar ways. Since it is impossible to optimise the nitrification and denitrification processes separately, the combined system should only be considered for large scale applications if space is very scarce and if a stable raw water composition can be expected. If strict limit values for nitrate have to be met in the effluent, a combination of pre- and post-denitrification is advantageous and advisable.
研究并比较了两种半工业上流生物曝气滤池(BAF)系统在各种运行和负荷条件下先进行反硝化再进行硝化的性能。第一个系统由两个分别用于反硝化和硝化步骤的独立反应器组成,而在第二个系统中,好氧硝化区填充在一个反应器的缺氧反硝化区之上。第二个系统有可能为大型处理厂大幅节省投资成本和空间需求。在去除碳质污染物和反硝化方面,这两个系统没有显著差异。然而,组合系统中的硝化作用因每日反冲洗导致不同生物群落混合而受到影响,其性能降至分离系统的50 - 70%。氧浓度、原水成分和负荷率等因素以类似方式影响两个系统的硝化速率。由于无法分别优化硝化和反硝化过程,仅在空间非常稀缺且原水成分可预期稳定的情况下,才应考虑将组合系统用于大规模应用。如果出水必须满足严格的硝酸盐限值,前置和后置反硝化相结合是有利且可取的。