Suppr超能文献

严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的血浆置换:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。

Plasmapheresis in severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial.

作者信息

Busund Rolf, Koukline Vladimir, Utrobin Uri, Nedashkovsky Edvard

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Tromsø University Hospital, 9038 Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2002 Oct;28(10):1434-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1410-7. Epub 2002 Jul 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of plasmapheresis in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, clinical trial with a planned, midstudy, interim analysis.

SETTING

Intensive care unit in a university hospital in Archangels, Russia.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

INTERVENTIONS

One hundred and six patients were randomised to receive either standard therapy or an add-on treatment with plasmapheresis.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The primary endpoint was 28-day survival. Septic shock was diagnosed in 57% of the plasmapheresis-treated patients and 54% of the control patients. Mean APACHE III score at entry was 56.4 in the plasmapheresis group and 53.5 in the control group. The 28-day, all-cause mortality rate was 33.3% (18/54) in the plasmapheresis group and 53.8% (28/52) in the control group. This represents a relative risk for fatal outcome in the plasmapheresis group of 0.61, an absolute risk reduction of 20.5% and a number of patients needed to treat of 4.9. Apart from six transient episodes of hypotension and one allergic reaction to fresh frozen plasma, no adverse reactions were attributable to the plasmapheresis treatment in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasmapheresis may be an important adjuvant to conventional treatment to reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Plasmapheresis is a safe procedure in the treatment of septic patients. A prospective randomised multicentre trial is warranted to confirm our results and to determine which subgroups of septic patients will benefit most from this treatment modality.

摘要

目的

确定血浆置换术治疗严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者的疗效及安全性。

设计

前瞻性、随机临床试验,并进行计划中的中期期中分析。

地点

俄罗斯阿尔汉格尔斯克市一所大学医院的重症监护病房。

患者

连续入选的严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者。

干预措施

106例患者被随机分为两组,分别接受标准治疗或在标准治疗基础上加用血浆置换术。

测量指标及结果

主要终点为28天生存率。接受血浆置换术治疗的患者中57%被诊断为感染性休克,对照组患者中这一比例为54%。血浆置换术组患者入组时的平均急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE III)评分为56.4,对照组为53.5。血浆置换术组28天全因死亡率为33.3%(18/54),对照组为53.8%(28/52)。这表明血浆置换术组的死亡相对风险为0.61,绝对风险降低20.5%,需治疗的患者数为4.9。除6次短暂性低血压发作及1例对新鲜冰冻血浆的过敏反应外,本研究中血浆置换术治疗未出现其他不良反应。

结论

血浆置换术可能是传统治疗的重要辅助手段,可降低严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者的死亡率。血浆置换术治疗脓毒症患者是安全的。有必要进行一项前瞻性随机多中心试验以证实我们的结果,并确定哪些脓毒症患者亚组将从这种治疗方式中获益最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验