Ackroff Karen, Sclafani Anthony
Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College and the Graduate School of the City University of New York, 2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2002 Dec;74(1):229-40. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00987-5.
A previous report showed that outbred rats acquired preferences for a sweetened conditioned stimulus (CS) flavor paired with intragastric ethanol. To evaluate the role of sweet taste in ethanol conditioning, this study compared training with sweetened and unsweetened flavors. In Experiment 1, nondeprived rats were trained to drink one flavored solution (CS+, e.g., grape) paired with intragastric infusion of 5% ethanol and another (CS-, e.g., cherry) paired with intragastric water on alternate days. The volume of ethanol solution infused was matched to the volume of flavored solution the rats consumed. The sweet group's flavors initially contained 0.2% saccharin, reduced to 0.1%, 0.05%, and 0% over days; the plain group's flavors were unsweetened. The sweet group drank more and self-infused more ethanol during training and its preference for the CS+ over the CS- (without saccharin) exceeded that of the plain group (75% versus 62%). Experiment 2 equated total ethanol intake in rats trained with two combinations of flavor quality and ethanol concentration. The Sweet5 group drank flavors with 0.2% saccharin throughout training and tests and received 5% ethanol when they drank CS+, while the Plain10 group drank unsweetened flavors and the CS+ was paired with 10% ethanol. Despite equal daily ethanol doses, the Sweet5 group strongly preferred the CS+ (89%) while the Plain10 group avoided it (31%). The two groups continued to show opposite CS+ preference profiles even when both were tested with sweet CS flavors and 10% ethanol infusions. Thus, sweet taste contributes to the development of ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences, and this effect is not explained by a simple enhancement of ethanol intake.
先前的一份报告显示,远交群大鼠会对与胃内注射乙醇配对的甜味条件刺激(CS)味道产生偏好。为了评估甜味在乙醇条件反射中的作用,本研究比较了用甜味和非甜味味道进行训练的情况。在实验1中,未禁食的大鼠被训练在交替的日子里饮用一种与胃内注射5%乙醇配对的调味溶液(CS+,例如葡萄味)和另一种与胃内注射水配对的调味溶液(CS-,例如樱桃味)。注入的乙醇溶液体积与大鼠消耗的调味溶液体积相匹配。甜味组的味道最初含有0.2%的糖精,随着时间推移分别降至0.1%、0.05%和0%;普通组的味道不添加甜味剂。在训练期间,甜味组饮用更多且自我注射更多乙醇,并且其对CS+相对于CS-(无糖精)的偏好超过了普通组(75%对62%)。实验2使接受两种味道质量和乙醇浓度组合训练的大鼠的乙醇总摄入量相等。Sweet5组在整个训练和测试过程中饮用含有0.2%糖精的味道,当它们饮用CS+时接受5%乙醇,而Plain10组饮用无甜味的味道,CS+与10%乙醇配对。尽管每日乙醇剂量相等,但Sweet5组强烈偏好CS+(89%),而Plain10组则回避它(31%)。即使两组都用甜味CS味道和10%乙醇注射进行测试,它们仍继续表现出相反的CS+偏好模式。因此,甜味有助于乙醇条件性味道偏好的形成,并且这种效应不能用乙醇摄入量的简单增加来解释。