Lauder Tamara D
Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Neurology, Mayo Medical School, 200 First Street, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2002 Aug;13(3):451-67. doi: 10.1016/s1047-9651(02)00006-2.
The validity of the history and physical examination varies with study method and the gold standard used. In general, symptoms are more sensitive than specific, and most patients with radiculopathy do present with some characteristic complaints. With the exception of the ipsilateral SLR, most physical examination findings are more specific than sensitive. In patients with suspected radiculopathy, having at least one abnormal physical examination finding makes the probability of having an abnormal electrodiagnostic study more likely than if the results of the physical examination are normal. Having a normal physical examination, however, does not rule out the possibility of having a radiculopathy that is revealed either electrodiagnostically or surgically. Although the history and physical examination may not be perfect tools for the diagnosis of radiculopathy or predicting electrodiagnostic outcome, they are an essential part of the clinical evaluation to assist in formulating a differential diagnosis and guiding the electrodiagnostic study.
病史和体格检查的有效性因研究方法和所采用的金标准而异。一般来说,症状的敏感性高于特异性,大多数神经根病患者确实会出现一些特征性主诉。除了同侧直腿抬高试验外,大多数体格检查结果的特异性高于敏感性。在疑似神经根病的患者中,与体格检查结果正常的情况相比,至少有一项异常的体格检查结果会使电诊断研究结果异常的可能性更大。然而,体格检查结果正常并不排除通过电诊断或手术发现神经根病的可能性。虽然病史和体格检查可能不是诊断神经根病或预测电诊断结果的完美工具,但它们是临床评估的重要组成部分,有助于进行鉴别诊断并指导电诊断研究。