Pastorini Jennifer, Forstner Michael R J, Martin Robert D
Anthropologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Hum Evol. 2002 Oct;43(4):463-78.
The family Lemuridae includes four genera: Eulemur, Hapalemur, Lemur,Varecia. Taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships between L. catta, Eulemur and Hapalemur, and of Varecia to these other lemurids, continue to be hotly debated. Nodal relationships among the five Eulemur species also remain contentious. A mitochondrial DNA sequence dataset from the ND 3, ND 4 L, ND 4 genes and five tRNAs (Gly, Arg, His, Ser, Leu) was generated to try to clarify phylogenetic relationships w ithin the Lemuridae. Samples (n=39) from all ten lemurid species were collected and analysed. Three Daubentonia madagascariensis were included as outgroup taxa. The approximately 2400 bp sequences were analysed using maximum parsimony, neighbor-joining and maximum likelihood methods. The results support monophyly of Eulemur, a basal divergence of Varecia, and a sister-group relationship for Lemur/Hapalemur. Based on tree topology, bootstrap values, and pairwise distance comparisons, we conclude thatVarecia and Eulemur both represent distinct genera separate from L. catta. H. griseus andH. aureus form a clade with strong support, but the sequence data do not permit robust resolution of the trichotomy involving H. simus, H. aureus/H. griseus and L. catta. Within Eulemur there is strong support for a clade containing E. fulvus, E. mongoz and E. rubriventer. However, analyses failed to clearly resolve relationships among those three species or with the more distantly related E. coronatus and E. macaco. Our sequencing data support the current subspecific status of E.m. macaco and E.m. flavifrons, and that of V.v. variegata and V.v. rubra. However, tree topology and relatively large genetic distances among individual V.v. variegata indicate that there may be more phylogenetic structure within this taxon than is indicated by current taxonomy.
大狐猴属(Eulemur)、毛狐猴属(Hapalemur)、狐猴属(Lemur)、领狐猴属(Varecia)。环尾狐猴(L. catta)、大狐猴属和毛狐猴属之间以及领狐猴属与其他狐猴科动物之间的分类学和系统发育关系一直是激烈争论的焦点。五个大狐猴物种之间的节点关系也仍然存在争议。生成了一个来自ND 3、ND 4 L、ND 4基因和五个tRNA(甘氨酸、精氨酸、组氨酸、丝氨酸、亮氨酸)的线粒体DNA序列数据集,试图阐明狐猴科内部的系统发育关系。收集并分析了所有十个狐猴科物种的样本(n = 39)。包括三只马达加斯加指猴(Daubentonia madagascariensis)作为外类群分类单元。使用最大简约法、邻接法和最大似然法对约2400 bp的序列进行了分析。结果支持大狐猴属的单系性、领狐猴属的基部分歧以及狐猴属/毛狐猴属的姐妹群关系。基于树拓扑结构、自展值和成对距离比较,我们得出结论,领狐猴属和大狐猴属都代表与环尾狐猴不同的独特属。灰毛狐猴(H. griseus)和金竹狐猴(H. aureus)形成了一个得到有力支持的分支,但序列数据无法对涉及桑氏狐猴(H. simus)、金竹狐猴/灰毛狐猴和环尾狐猴的三分法进行可靠解析。在大狐猴属内,有一个包含褐美狐猴(E. fulvus)、獴美狐猴(E.mongoz)和红腹美狐猴(E. rubriventer)的分支得到了有力支持。然而,分析未能明确解析这三个物种之间的关系,也未能解析它们与亲缘关系较远的冠美狐猴(E. coronatus)和黑美狐猴(E. macaco)之间的关系。我们的测序数据支持黑美狐猴指名亚种(E.m. macaco)和黄额美狐猴(E.m. flavifrons)以及黑白领狐猴指名亚种(V.v. variegata)和红领狐猴(V.v. rubra)目前的亚种地位。然而,树拓扑结构和黑白领狐猴指名亚种个体之间相对较大的遗传距离表明,该分类单元内可能存在比当前分类法所显示的更多的系统发育结构。