Suppr超能文献

稳定的肾移植受者转换为生物等效的环孢素制剂。

Conversion of stable renal allograft recipients to a bioequivalent cyclosporine formulation.

作者信息

Roza Allan, Tomlanovich Stephen, Merion Robert, Pollak Raymond, Wright Francis, Rajagopalan P, Pruett Timothy, Scandling John, Ryan Joan, Awni Walid, Schweitzer Sarah, Greco Renee, Lam Wayne, Nabulsi Azmi, Hoffman Rebecca

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2002 Oct 15;74(7):1013-7. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200210150-00020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gengraf capsule, an AB-rated generic cyclosporine for Neoral, has been shown to be bioequivalent in previous studies. The purpose of this pharmacokinetic study performed in stable renal transplant recipients was to evaluate interchangeability of Gengraf and Neoral.

METHODS

Using an open-label, three-period design, 50 renal transplant recipients taking stable doses of Neoral completed a multicenter study. Subjects continued their Neoral regimen during period I (days 1-14). Subjects then switched from Neoral on a milligram-for-milligram basis to Gengraf during period II (days 15-28), followed by conversion to the same milligram-for-milligram dosing regimen of Neoral during period III (days 29-35). Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic evaluations (maximum observed blood concentration [C(max) ], concentration before dosing [C(trough) ], time to maximum observed concentration [T(max) ], and area under the blood concentration-vs.-time curve [AUC]) occurred on days 1, 14, 15, 28, and 29. Additional predose samples (C (trough)) were evaluated on days 7, 21, and 35. Laboratory and safety parameters were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of Gengraf (C(max), T(max), C(trough), and AUC) were indistinguishable from the Neoral values in stable renal allograft recipients. The bioequivalent capsules were interchangeable with respect to C(max), C(trough), and AUC at steady state and also on conversion from one capsule formulation to the other. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the Gengraf versus Neoral comparison at steady state (day 28 vs. day 14) were 0.95 to 1.03 for AUC and 0.92 to 1.04 for C(max). Trough concentrations remained consistent throughout the study, with no need for dosage adjustment in any of the subjects. Gengraf is well tolerated, with an excellent safety profile, comparable to the safety profile of Neoral. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacokinetics of Gengraf are equivalent and indistinguishable from those of Neoral. Gengraf is well tolerated and interchangeable with Neoral in stable renal transplant recipients.

摘要

背景

Gengraf胶囊是Neoral的AB级环孢素仿制药,先前的研究已表明其具有生物等效性。本药代动力学研究在稳定的肾移植受者中进行,目的是评估Gengraf与Neoral的可互换性。

方法

采用开放标签、三阶段设计,50名服用稳定剂量Neoral的肾移植受者完成了一项多中心研究。受试者在第一阶段(第1 - 14天)继续其Neoral治疗方案。然后在第二阶段(第15 - 28天),受试者按毫克对毫克的剂量从Neoral转换为Gengraf,随后在第三阶段(第29 - 35天)再转换回相同毫克对毫克剂量的Neoral治疗方案。在第1、14、15、28和29天进行12小时药代动力学评估(最大观察血药浓度[C(max)]、给药前浓度[C(trough)]、达到最大观察浓度的时间[T(max)]以及血药浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUC])。在第7、21和35天评估额外的给药前样本(C(trough))。还评估了实验室和安全性参数。

结果

在稳定的肾移植受者中,Gengraf的药代动力学(C(max)、T(max)、C(trough)和AUC)与Neoral的值无差异。在稳态时以及从一种胶囊制剂转换为另一种制剂时,生物等效的胶囊在C(max)、C(trough)和AUC方面是可互换的。稳态时(第28天与第14天)Gengraf与Neoral比较的90%置信区间(CI),AUC为0.95至1.03,C(max)为0.92至1.04。在整个研究过程中谷浓度保持一致,所有受试者均无需调整剂量。Gengraf耐受性良好,具有出色的安全性,与Neoral的安全性相当。结论:Gengraf的药代动力学与Neoral等效且无差异。在稳定的肾移植受者中,Gengraf耐受性良好且可与Neoral互换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验