Suppr超能文献

雄性小鼠(小家鼠)第二次减数分裂中期的定量研究。

A quantitative study of the second meiotic metaphase in male mice (Mus musculus).

作者信息

Beatty R A, Lim M C, Coulter V J

出版信息

Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1975;15(4):256-75. doi: 10.1159/000130523.

Abstract

Over 11,000 second meiotic metaphase spreads stained for the pericentromeric region have been studied quantitatively in male mice of 14 strains. The sex-chromosome constitution of a cell could be judged objectively if X and Y chromosomes and ploidy were all scored. A bias arose if only Y chromosomes and ploidy were scored but could be corrected statistically. There was no sign of other forms of bias. The original contiguity of X and Y second metaphases in vivo was very occasionally evident in the preparations. Most of the subhaploid aneuploid counts were assumed to be artifactual. The incidence of truly aneuploid second metaphases in 13 strains was estimated as 0.38+/-0.12%. The estimated average rate per chromosome was 0.019+/-0.006%, with a comparable order of magnitude for the sex chromosomes alone. Simultaneous aneuploidy of two or more chromosomes of the haploid set was estimated to be very rare. Of the spreads from 13 strains, 9.6% were polyploid (2N, 3N, 4N) and showed most of the possible combinations of sex chromosomes. Nearly all the polyploid spreads were considered to arise by artifactual cell fusion at the time of second metaphase during the preparative technique, especially of the X and Y daughter-cell products of the first meiotic division. Other modes of origin (true polyploidy, accidental superposition of cells during preparation) were unlikely. The data could be accommodated by a statistical model with only four parameters. It allowed for artifactual fusion mainly between daughter cells but also between non-daughter cells, bias in one scoring method, and bias in the numbers of cells with given ploidy successfully mounted. Current techniques of chromosome preparation were thought to be wholly unsuitable for the recognition of true polyploidy. The artifactual origin of polyploid spreads was borne out by an absence of polyploid spermatozoa in 14 strains. There appeared to be a virtually constant transmission rate of paternal X and Y chromosomes from early meiosis to late blastocyst. The estimated rate of 49.05+/-0.67% with a Y chromosome also estimated the primary sex ratio. There was evidence of polymorphism in autosomal pericentromeric staining in 3 strains. No measure of the numbers of autosomes or sex chromosomes varied significantly between duplicate preparations or between duplicate males of a strain.

摘要

在14个品系的雄性小鼠中,对超过11,000个经着丝粒周围区域染色的第二次减数分裂中期铺片进行了定量研究。如果对X和Y染色体以及倍性都进行计数,就可以客观地判断细胞的性染色体组成。如果只对Y染色体和倍性进行计数,就会出现偏差,但可以通过统计学方法进行校正。没有其他形式偏差的迹象。在制备物中,偶尔会明显看到体内X和Y第二次中期的原始连续性。大多数亚单倍体非整倍体计数被认为是人为造成的。估计13个品系中真正的非整倍体第二次中期的发生率为0.38±0.12%。估计每个染色体的平均发生率为0.019±0.006%,仅性染色体的发生率也处于类似的数量级。估计单倍体组中两个或更多染色体同时发生非整倍体的情况非常罕见。在13个品系的铺片中,9.6%是多倍体(2N、3N、4N),并显示出性染色体的大多数可能组合。几乎所有多倍体铺片都被认为是在制备技术的第二次中期时,特别是第一次减数分裂的X和Y子细胞产物之间,由于人为的细胞融合而产生的。其他起源方式(真正的多倍体、制备过程中细胞的偶然叠加)不太可能。这些数据可以用一个仅含四个参数的统计模型来拟合。该模型考虑了主要在子细胞之间但也在非子细胞之间的人为融合、一种评分方法中的偏差以及成功固定的具有给定倍性的细胞数量的偏差。目前的染色体制备技术被认为完全不适用于识别真正的多倍体。14个品系中没有多倍体精子证实了多倍体铺片的人为起源。从减数分裂早期到胚泡晚期,父本X和Y染色体的传递率似乎几乎恒定。估计带有Y染色体的传递率为49.05±0.67%,这也估计了初级性别比。有证据表明3个品系的常染色体着丝粒周围染色存在多态性。在重复制备物之间或一个品系的重复雄性个体之间,常染色体或性染色体数量的测量没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验