相似文献
1
The peer review process (aka peer reviewology).
Biol Res Nurs. 2002 Oct;4(2):71-2. doi: 10.1177/1099800402238328.
2
Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
Lancet. 2003 Aug 30;362(9385):747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14218-3.
3
Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
Nature. 2006 Jan 19;439(7074):252. doi: 10.1038/439252b.
4
How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004 Jan;51(1):127-30.
5
Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Jan;156(1):11-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.1.11.
6
The politics of publication.
Nature. 2003 Mar 20;422(6929):259-61. doi: 10.1038/422259a.
7
Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):209-10. doi: 10.1038/421209b.
8
Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):26. doi: 10.1038/442026a.
9
Three cheers for peers.
Nature. 2006 Jan 12;439(7073):118. doi: 10.1038/439118a.
10
Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Nature. 2002 Oct 24;419(6909):772-6. doi: 10.1038/419772a.
Zotero 插件