• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混杂因素的历史。

The history of confounding.

作者信息

Vandenbroucke Jan P

机构信息

Leiden University Medical Centre.

出版信息

Soz Praventivmed. 2002;47(4):216-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01326402.

DOI:10.1007/BF01326402
PMID:12415925
Abstract

Confounding is a basic problem of comparability--and therefore has always been present in science. Originally a plain English word, it acquired more specific meanings in epidemiologic thinking about experimental and non-experimental research. The use of the word can be traced to Fisher. The concept was developed more fully in social science research, among others by Kish. Landmark developments in epidemiology in the second half of the 20th century were by Cornfield and by Miettinen. These developments emphasised that reasoning about confounding is almost entirely an a priori process that we have to impose upon the data and the data-analysis to arrive at a meaningful interpretation. The problems of confounding present their old challenges again in recent applications to genetic epidemiology.

摘要

混杂是可比性的一个基本问题,因此在科学领域一直存在。它最初是一个普通的英语单词,在流行病学对实验性和非实验性研究的思考中获得了更具体的含义。这个词的使用可以追溯到费舍尔。该概念在社会科学研究等领域得到了更充分的发展,其中包括基什的贡献。20世纪下半叶流行病学的里程碑式发展来自科恩菲尔德和米耶蒂宁。这些发展强调,关于混杂的推理几乎完全是一个先验过程,我们必须将其应用于数据和数据分析,以获得有意义的解释。在最近应用于遗传流行病学的过程中,混杂问题再次带来了旧有的挑战。

相似文献

1
The history of confounding.混杂因素的历史。
Soz Praventivmed. 2002;47(4):216-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01326402.
2
History of the modern epidemiological concept of confounding.混杂概念的现代流行病学史。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Apr;65(4):297-300. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.112565. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
3
Confounding and effect-modification. 1974.混杂与效应修正。1974年。
Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jun 15;141(12):1113-6, discussion 1111-2. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117384.
4
[History of the development of epidemiologic experimental study].[流行病学实验研究的发展历程]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Jul;25(7):633-6.
5
Origin, History, and Meanings of the Word .这个词的起源、历史和含义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Dec;5(6). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MTBP-0004-2016.
6
Evolution of epidemiologic methods and concepts in selected textbooks of the 20th century.20世纪部分教科书中流行病学方法与概念的演变
Soz Praventivmed. 2004;49(2):97-104. doi: 10.1007/s00038-004-3117-8.
7
Epidemiology and social sciences: towards a critical reengagement in the 21st century.流行病学与社会科学:迈向21世纪的批判性重新参与
Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(1):155-63. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a018014.
8
[In the beginning was the Word].太初有道。
Med Sci (Paris). 2016 Jan;32(1):125-6. doi: 10.1051/medsci/20163201022. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
9
The evolution of population science: advent of the mega cohort.人口科学的演变:大型队列的出现。
JAMA. 2010 Nov 24;304(20):2288-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1691.
10
A century of case-control studies: progress?一个世纪的病例对照研究:有进展吗?
J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1-2):5-13. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90004-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Carl Liebermeister and the emergence of modern medical statistics Part 2: the origin, use and limitations of his method.卡尔·利伯迈斯特与现代医学统计学的兴起 第二部分:他的方法的起源、应用及局限性
J R Soc Med. 2022 Mar;115(3):112-115. doi: 10.1177/01410768221082390.
2
Multimodal prognostic features of seizure freedom in epilepsy surgery.癫痫手术中无癫痫发作的多模态预后特征。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022 May;93(5):499-508. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327119. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
3
Control of confounding in the analysis phase - an overview for clinicians.

本文引用的文献

1
THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?环境与疾病:关联还是因果关系?
Proc R Soc Med. 1965 May;58(5):295-300. doi: 10.1177/003591576505800503.
2
Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.疾病回顾性研究数据的统计分析方面
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719-48.
3
Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions.吸烟与肺癌:近期证据及若干问题探讨
分析阶段的混杂因素控制——临床医生概述
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar 31;9:195-204. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S129886. eCollection 2017.
4
Epidemiologic methods: beyond clinical medicine, beyond epidemiology.流行病学方法:超越临床医学,超越流行病学。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(8):733-5. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000036613.38682.4c.
5
The making of an epidemiological theory of bias and confounding.偏差与混杂因素的流行病学理论的形成。
Soz Praventivmed. 2002;47(3):146. doi: 10.1007/BF01591882.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Jan;22(1):173-203.
4
Alternative medicine: a "mirror image" for scientific reasoning in conventional medicine.替代医学:传统医学中科学推理的“镜像”。
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Oct 2;135(7):507-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-7-200110020-00010.
5
In defense of case reports and case series.为病例报告和病例系列辩护。
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Feb 20;134(4):330-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-4-200102200-00017.
6
Population stratification in epidemiologic studies of common genetic variants and cancer: quantification of bias.常见基因变异与癌症流行病学研究中的人群分层:偏倚的量化
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jul 19;92(14):1151-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.14.1151.
7
Why transition from alternation to randomisation in clinical trials was made.临床试验为何从交替法转变为随机法。
BMJ. 1999 Nov 20;319(7221):1372. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7221.1372.
8
Statistics notes. Treatment allocation in controlled trials: why randomise?统计学笔记。对照试验中的治疗分配:为何要随机化?
BMJ. 1999 May 1;318(7192):1209. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7192.1209.
9
Invited commentary: response to Science article, "Epidemiology faces its limits".特邀评论:对《科学》杂志文章《流行病学面临其局限性》的回应
Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Apr 15;143(8):747-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008811.
10
The value of randomization and control in clinical trials.临床试验中随机化和对照的价值。
Stat Med. 1993 Aug;12(15-16):1421-31; discussion 1433-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121508.