Suppr超能文献

心房颤动患者肺静脉的独特电生理特性。

Distinctive electrophysiological properties of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Jaïs Pierre, Hocini Mélèze, Macle Laurent, Choi Kee-Joon, Deisenhofer Isabel, Weerasooriya Rukshen, Shah Dipen C, Garrigue Stéphane, Raybaud Florence, Scavee Christophe, Le Metayer Philippe, Clémenty Jacques, Haïssaguerre Michel

机构信息

Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

出版信息

Circulation. 2002 Nov 5;106(19):2479-85. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036744.39782.9f.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently initiated from pulmonary veins (PVs), but little is known of the electrophysiological properties of PVs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two groups were studied: 28 patients (49+/-13 years old) with paroxysmal AF and 20 control patients (49+/-14 years old) without AF. Effective and functional refractory period and conduction time from PV to left atrium (LA) were compared in the 2 groups by use of programmed stimulation with a single extrastimulus in the PVs and LA. In the AF group, the venous effective refractory periods (ERPs) were shorter than that of the LA: 185+/-71 versus 253+/-21 ms, P<0.001, whereas in the control group, they were longer (282+/-45 versus 253+/-41 ms, P=0.009). The venous ERPs and functional refractory periods in patients with AF were also shorter than that observed in control subjects (185+/-71 versus 282+/-45 ms and 210+/-77 versus 315+/-43 ms, respectively, P<0.001), whereas LA ERPs were not significantly different. Decremental conduction in PVs was more frequent (93% versus 56%, P=0.01) and had a greater increment (102+/-65 versus 42+/-40 ms, P<0.001) in patients with AF. Finally, AF was more frequently induced when pacing was performed in PVs (22 of 90) versus LA (1 of 81) in patients with AF (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The PVs of patients with AF exhibited distinctive electrophysiological properties, which were strikingly different from those of patients devoid of AF, potentially explaining their arrhythmogenicity.

摘要

背景

心房颤动(AF)常起源于肺静脉(PVs),但对肺静脉的电生理特性了解甚少。

方法与结果

研究了两组:28例阵发性AF患者(49±13岁)和20例无AF的对照患者(49±14岁)。通过在肺静脉和左心房(LA)中使用单个额外刺激的程控刺激,比较两组从肺静脉到左心房的有效不应期、功能不应期和传导时间。在AF组中,静脉有效不应期(ERPs)短于左心房:185±71对253±21毫秒,P<0.001,而在对照组中,静脉有效不应期更长(282±45对253±41毫秒,P=0.009)。AF患者的静脉有效不应期和功能不应期也短于对照组(分别为185±71对282±45毫秒和210±77对315±43毫秒,P<0.001),而左心房有效不应期无显著差异。AF患者肺静脉递减传导更频繁(93%对56%,P=0.01)且增加幅度更大(102±65对42±40毫秒,P<0.001)。最后,AF患者在肺静脉起搏时(90例中的22例)比在左心房起搏时(81例中的1例)更频繁地诱发AF(P<0.001)。

结论

AF患者的肺静脉表现出独特的电生理特性,与无AF患者的电生理特性显著不同,这可能解释了它们的致心律失常性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验