Suppr超能文献

三组力量训练在激发力量方面优于一组同等强度的训练。

Three sets of weight training superior to 1 set with equal intensity for eliciting strength.

作者信息

Rhea Matthew R, Alvar Brent A, Ball Stephen D, Burkett Lee N

机构信息

Exercise and Wellness Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science and Physical Education, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85212, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Nov;16(4):525-9.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare single and multiple sets of weight training for strength gains in recreationally trained individuals. Sixteen men (age = 21 +/- 2.0) were randomly assigned to 1 set (S-1; n = 8) or 3 set (S-3; n = 8) groups and trained 3 days per week for 12 weeks. One repetition maximum (1RM) was recorded for bench press and leg press at pre-, mid-, and posttest. Subjects trained according to daily undulating periodization (DUP), involving the bench press and leg press exercises between 4RM and 8RM. Training intensity was equated for both groups. Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed statistically significant differences favoring S-3 in the leg press (p < 0.05, effect size [ES] = 6.5) and differences approaching significance in the bench press (p = 0.07, ES = 2.3). The results demonstrate that for recreationally trained individuals using DUP training, 3 sets of training are superior to 1 set for eliciting maximal strength gains.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较单次和多次力量训练对休闲训练者力量增长的影响。16名男性(年龄=21±2.0岁)被随机分为1组(S-1;n=8)或3组(S-3;n=8),每周训练3天,共训练12周。在测试前、测试中期和测试后记录卧推和腿举的1次最大重复量(1RM)。受试者按照每日波动周期训练法(DUP)进行训练,包括4RM至8RM的卧推和腿举练习。两组的训练强度相等。重复测量方差分析显示,腿举方面S-3组有统计学显著差异(p<0.05,效应量[ES]=6.5),卧推方面差异接近显著(p=0.07,ES=2.3)。结果表明,对于采用DUP训练的休闲训练者,3组训练在引发最大力量增长方面优于1组训练。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验