Kruse Wolfgang, Hoffmann Klaus-Peter
Department of Zoology and Neurobiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, ND7, 44780 Bochum, Germany.
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Dec;147(3):360-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1252-0. Epub 2002 Oct 10.
We studied the incidence of oscillatory activity in the gamma range (35-110 Hz) in single cell and multi-unit activity recorded from extrastriate areas MT (middle temporal) and MST (superior middle temporal) while rhesus monkeys performed different behavioural tasks. During full field stimulation by coherent motion of random dots, we observed gamma oscillations in approximately 20% of the cells. The average oscillation frequencies differed considerably between both animals (60 Hz vs 100 Hz). In both animals, oscillatory modulation was particularly strong at sites that showed a strong directional bias to visual stimulation. The amount of oscillatory activity was roughly the same whether stimulus movement was presented during fixation or whether the animal had to perform pursuit movements across a stationary visual pattern. If cells were engaged in gamma oscillations during visual stimulation, the amount of oscillatory modulation was dependent on stimulus direction, stimulus velocity and stimulus contrast. During a visually guided manual tracking task no gamma activity was detectable. Cells with clear oscillatory modulation during the full field stimulation failed to show oscillatory activity when the animal was involved in a motor task in which the visual motion information had to be evaluated for the correct movement of the hand. Our results reaffirm the ubiquitous presence of stimulus-induced gamma oscillation in extrastriate areas MT and MST of the awake monkey during various stimulus conditions, but they fail to support the notion that high-frequency gamma oscillations in this area play a specific role during cortical control of a motor response to visual stimulation.
我们研究了恒河猴在执行不同行为任务时,从纹外区域MT(颞中区)和MST(颞上中区)记录的单细胞和多单元活动中伽马波段(35 - 110赫兹)振荡活动的发生率。在随机点的连贯运动进行全场刺激期间,我们在约20%的细胞中观察到伽马振荡。两只动物的平均振荡频率差异很大(分别为60赫兹和100赫兹)。在两只动物中,振荡调制在对视觉刺激表现出强烈方向偏好的部位尤其强烈。无论刺激运动是在注视期间呈现,还是动物必须对静止视觉模式进行追踪运动,振荡活动的量大致相同。如果细胞在视觉刺激期间参与伽马振荡,振荡调制的量取决于刺激方向、刺激速度和刺激对比度。在视觉引导的手动追踪任务中,未检测到伽马活动。在全场刺激期间具有明显振荡调制的细胞,当动物参与一项运动任务时,即必须评估视觉运动信息以正确移动手部时,并未表现出振荡活动。我们的结果再次证实,在各种刺激条件下,清醒猴子的纹外区域MT和MST中普遍存在刺激诱发的伽马振荡,但它们并不支持这一观点,即该区域的高频伽马振荡在对视觉刺激的运动反应的皮质控制中起特定作用。