Wilschke S
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(1):16-26.
Less than half of all children who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits and live in a single-parent home receive child support services. Although filing for child support is a condition of eligibility for income assistance programs such as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), it is not a condition of eligibility for SSI benefits. Requiring single custodial parents applying for SSI on behalf of their children to pursue child support payments might result in more children on SSI receiving child support, and since the Social Security Administration (SSA) excludes one-third of child support when determining benefit amounts, increased receipt of child support would enhance the financial well-being of SSI children. Improving access to data on child support would enhance the integrity of the SSI program by reducing overpayments to children receiving child support. This article looks at the child support provisions in SSI and other means-tested programs and discusses policy options for improving receipt of child support and access to related data. Requiring cooperation with child support enforcement agencies would be consistent with the philosophy that the SSI program should serve as a program of last resort. Whenever possible, both parents should take primary responsibility for their children. While such a requirement has the potential to improve the financial status of children receiving SSI, factors such as their low-income status and their involvement with the TANF program raise questions about how much those children will actually benefit from such a requirement. Even if many additional children do not receive child support, the requirement demonstrates SSA's dedication to the stewardship of the SSI program. However, if custodial parents fail to comply with the requirement, children may be worse off as a result of the requirement. SSA should carefully pursue a requirement to induce cooperation while protecting children to the greatest extent possible. Improving access to child support data would enhance the integrity of the SSI program by reducing overpayments to children receiving child support. Given the reality of limited administrative resources as well as the apparent difficulties of gaining access to the needed child support data, SSA must decide which data matches to pursue and which requirements enhance the program enough to justify the additional resources. Although the options discussed in this article may be chosen independently, there are important interactions to consider. For example, although a requirement to pursue support might result in more children receiving child support, SSA would still rely on parents to report that income unless it was able to gain better access to child support data. Implementing the option to require cooperation with child support enforcement (CSE) agencies could improve verification of income from child support if field offices developed better communication with local CSE offices. However, by itself, it would not have as great an effect on overpayments as would having direct access to child support data. In a 1999 report, the General Accounting Office acknowledged that the potential benefit reductions would be offset by the cost for SSA to administer a child support cooperation requirement and by the costs to the CSE programs to provide services. The report suggested that the goals of promoting parental responsibility and increasing the income of children receiving SSI should be pursued despite the costs. Requiring cooperation may increase administrative costs by $6 million over 5 years and may result in program savings. Gaining access to data may be more expensive and may not prevent overpayments to the same extent as other data-matching workloads on which SSA has placed a priority. SSA should continue to work with federal child support enforcement and with individual states to develop a cost-effective way to identify child support income.
领取补充保障收入(SSI)福利且生活在单亲家庭的儿童中,不到一半能获得子女抚养费服务。尽管申请子女抚养费是诸如贫困家庭临时援助(TANF)等收入援助项目资格的一个条件,但并非获得SSI福利资格的条件。要求代表子女申请SSI的单亲监护人追讨子女抚养费,可能会使更多领取SSI的儿童获得子女抚养费,而且由于社会保障管理局(SSA)在确定福利金额时会排除三分之一的子女抚养费,增加子女抚养费的收取将改善领取SSI儿童的财务状况。改善获取子女抚养费数据的途径,将通过减少向领取子女抚养费的儿童多支付款项,提高SSI项目的完整性。本文探讨了SSI及其他经过经济状况调查的项目中的子女抚养费规定,并讨论了改善子女抚养费收取情况及获取相关数据的政策选择。要求与子女抚养费执行机构合作,将符合SSI项目应作为最后求助项目的理念。只要有可能,父母双方都应主要为其子女负责。虽然这样的要求有可能改善领取SSI儿童的财务状况,但诸如他们的低收入状况以及他们参与TANF项目等因素,引发了关于这些儿童实际将从该要求中受益多少的疑问。即使许多额外的儿童没有获得子女抚养费,该要求也表明了SSA对管理SSI项目的尽责态度。然而,如果监护人不遵守该要求,儿童可能会因此而处境更糟。SSA应谨慎推行一项要求,以促使合作,同时尽可能最大程度地保护儿童。改善获取子女抚养费数据的途径,将通过减少向领取子女抚养费的儿童多支付款项,提高SSI项目的完整性。鉴于行政资源有限的现实以及获取所需子女抚养费数据明显存在的困难,SSA必须决定要进行哪些数据匹配,以及哪些要求能使该项目得到足够改善,从而证明额外资源的合理性。虽然本文讨论的选项可以独立选择,但有一些重要的相互关系需要考虑。例如,尽管追讨抚养费的要求可能会使更多儿童获得子女抚养费,但SSA仍将依赖父母报告该收入,除非它能够更好地获取子女抚养费数据。如果外地办事处与当地子女抚养费执行办公室加强沟通,实施要求与子女抚养费执行(CSE)机构合作的选项,可能会改善对子女抚养费收入的核查。然而,就其本身而言,它对多支付款项的影响不会像直接获取子女抚养费数据那么大。在1999年的一份报告中,政府问责局承认,潜在的福利减少将被SSA管理子女抚养费合作要求的成本以及CSE项目提供服务的成本所抵消。该报告建议,尽管有成本,仍应追求促进父母责任和增加领取SSI儿童收入的目标。要求合作可能在5年内使行政成本增加600万美元,并且可能带来项目节省。获取数据可能成本更高,并且在防止多支付款项方面可能无法达到与SSA优先处理的其他数据匹配工作负荷相同的程度。SSA应继续与联邦子女抚养费执行机构以及各个州合作,制定一种经济有效的方式来识别子女抚养费收入。