Bond C A, Raehl Cynthia L, Franke Todd
Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center-Amarillo, 79106, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2002 Nov;22(11):1489-99. doi: 10.1592/phco.22.16.1489.33689.
We evaluated hospital demographics (census regions, size, teaching affiliation, hospital ownership, hospital pharmacy director's degree, pharmacist location within the hospital) and clinical pharmacist staffing/occupied bed in United States hospitals. A database was constructed from the 1992 American Hospital Association's Abridged Guide to the Health Care Field and the 1992 National Clinical Pharmacy Services database. Simple statistical tests and multiple regression analysis were employed. The study population consisted of 1391 hospitals that reported information on clinical pharmacist staffing. The mean number of clinical pharmacists/100 occupied beds was 0.51 +/- 0.18. Factors associated with increased clinical pharmacist staffing were west north central region (slope = 0.0029439, p = 0.002), Pacific region (slope = 0.0032089, p = 0.004), affiliation with pharmacy teaching hospitals (slope = 0.0025330, p = 0.0001), teaching hospitals (slope = 0.0028122, p = 0.001), federal government ownership (slope = 0.0029697, p = 0.012), directors with Pharm.D. degrees (slope = 0.0335020, p = 0.002), directors with M.S. Pharmacy degrees (slope = 0.0028622, p = 0.003), pharmacists in a decentralized location (slope = 0.0035393, p = 0.0001), and pharmacy technician staffing (slope = 0.0517713, p = 0.0001). Statistically significant associations between demographic variables and decreased clinical pharmacist staffing/occupied bed were mid-Atlantic region (slope = -0.0028237, p = 0.002), small size (slope = -0.0028894, p = 0.001), pharmacy directors with B.S. degrees (slope = -0.0019271, p = 0.023), and pharmacy administrator staffing (slope = -0.0184513, p = 0.042). The R2 for this multiple regression analysis was 28.31% and adjusted R2 was 24.83%. Increased pharmacy technician staffing had the greatest association (slope = 0.0517713) with increased clinical pharmacist staffing. Significant differences were observed between clinical pharmacist staffing and hospital demographic factors. It appears that one of the most effective ways to increase clinical pharmacist staffing is to increase pharmacy technician staffing (slope). These findings will help future researchers determine specific reasons why some types of hospitals have higher and some lower levels of clinical pharmacist staffing.
我们评估了美国医院的人口统计学特征(普查区域、规模、教学附属关系、医院所有权、医院药房主任的学位、药剂师在医院内的工作地点)以及临床药剂师配备/每占用床位的情况。我们根据1992年美国医院协会的《医疗保健领域简明指南》和1992年国家临床药学服务数据库构建了一个数据库。采用了简单统计测试和多元回归分析。研究人群包括1391家报告了临床药剂师配备信息的医院。临床药剂师/每100个占用床位的平均数量为0.51±0.18。与临床药剂师配备增加相关的因素包括西北中部地区(斜率 = 0.0029439,p = 0.002)、太平洋地区(斜率 = 0.0032089,p = 0.004)、与药学教学医院的附属关系(斜率 = 0.0025330,p = 0.0001)、教学医院(斜率 = 0.0028122,p = 0.001)、联邦政府所有(斜率 = 0.0029697,p = 0.012)、拥有药学博士学位的主任(斜率 = 0.0335020,p = 0.002)、拥有药学硕士学位的主任(斜率 = 0.0028622,p = 0.003)、处于分散地点的药剂师(斜率 = 0.0035393,p = 0.0001)以及药房技术员配备(斜率 = 0.0517713,p = 0.0001)。人口统计学变量与临床药剂师配备/每占用床位减少之间具有统计学显著关联的因素包括大西洋中部地区(斜率 = -0.0028237,p = 0.002)、小规模(斜率 = -0.0028894,p = 0.001)、拥有理学学士学位的药房主任(斜率 = -0.0019271,p = 0.023)以及药房管理人员配备(斜率 = -0.0184513,p = 0.042)。该多元回归分析的R²为28.31%,调整后的R²为24.83%。药房技术员配备增加与临床药剂师配备增加的关联最大(斜率 = 0.0517713)。在临床药剂师配备与医院人口统计学因素之间观察到了显著差异。看来增加临床药剂师配备的最有效方法之一是增加药房技术员配备(斜率)。这些发现将有助于未来的研究人员确定某些类型的医院临床药剂师配备水平较高或较低的具体原因。