Bur A, Woisetschläger C, Herkner H, Derhaschnig U, Quehenberger P, Hirschl M M
Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien Klinik für Notfallmedizin Währinger Gürtel 18-20 1090 Wien, Osterreich.
Z Kardiol. 2002 Sep;91(9):685-92. doi: 10.1007/s00392-002-0814-2.
Only a few studies have evaluated the efficacy of alpha-blocking agents in combination with other classes of antihypertensive agents, especially in patients not adequately controlled by monotherapy. As alpha-blockers have an additional beneficial effect on serum lipids, it seems reasonable to use them instead of beta-blockers or diuretics in insufficiently treated hypertensive patients with hyperlipidemia.
All patients with insufficient blood pressure control with either a calcium channel blocker or an ACE inhibitor and evidence of hyperlipidemia (total serum cholesterol > 5.69 mmol/L) were included into an open, randomized and prospective study to evaluate the effects of terazosin and atenolol on lipid profile in hypertensive patients. The patients received either terazosin (n = 26; dose 1 to 10 mg) or atenolol (n = 28; dose 25 to 100 mg). Blood pressure was assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement and serum lipids were evaluated at the time of inclusion and 12 weeks later.
Blood pressure was similar after 12 weeks of treatment (atenolol: 129 (9)/75 (7) mm Hg; terazosin: 128 (11)/75 (9) mm Hg) and total cholesterol was significantly reduced after 12 weeks of treatment (atenolol: Diff 0-12 weeks: 7.29 (1.32) versus 6.62 (1.14 mmol/L, p = 0.006; terazosin: 7.34 (0.93) versus 6.67 (0.85) mmol/L, p = 0.002). In the terazosin group, HDL-cholesterol increased and triglycerides decreased significantly (Diff 0-12 weeks: HDL-chol: 1.55 (0.31) versus 1.63 (0.44) mmol/L, p = 0.04; TG: 1.93 (1.17) versus 1.34 (0.64) mmol/L, p = 0.03). Comparing both groups a significant difference was found with regard to HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides (atenolol versus terazosin: HDL-chol: -0.05 (0.12) versus +0.08 (0.1) mmol/L, p = 0.04; TG: -0.18 (0.61) versus--0.59 (0.6), p = 0.03).
The alpha-blocker terazosin is as effective as atenolol when combined with either an ACE inhibitor or a calcium-channel blocker as a part of a multidrug regimen to achieve sufficient blood pressure control. In addition, terazosin is superior to atenolol with regard to the effect on the lipid profile of hypertensive and hyperlipidemic patients and seems therefore a reasonable alternative to beta-blockers in hypertensive patients with hyperlipidemia.
仅有少数研究评估了α阻滞剂与其他类别抗高血压药物联合使用的疗效,尤其是在单药治疗血压控制不佳的患者中。由于α阻滞剂对血脂有额外的有益作用,因此对于血脂异常且血压控制不佳的高血压患者,使用α阻滞剂而非β阻滞剂或利尿剂似乎是合理的。
所有使用钙通道阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂后血压控制不佳且有高脂血症证据(总血清胆固醇>5.69 mmol/L)的患者纳入一项开放、随机、前瞻性研究,以评估特拉唑嗪和阿替洛尔对高血压患者血脂谱的影响。患者分别接受特拉唑嗪(n = 26;剂量1至10 mg)或阿替洛尔(n = 28;剂量25至100 mg)治疗。通过24小时动态血压测量评估血压,并在入组时和12周后评估血脂。
治疗12周后血压相似(阿替洛尔组:129(9)/75(7)mmHg;特拉唑嗪组:128(11)/75(9)mmHg),治疗12周后总胆固醇显著降低(阿替洛尔组:0至12周差值:7.29(1.32)对6.62(1.14)mmol/L,p = 0.006;特拉唑嗪组:7.34(0.93)对6.67(0.85)mmol/L,p = 0.002)。在特拉唑嗪组中,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高,甘油三酯显著降低(0至12周差值:高密度脂蛋白胆固醇:1.55(0.31)对1.63(0.44)mmol/L,p = 0.04;甘油三酯:1.93(1.17)对1.34(0.64)mmol/L,p = 0.03)。比较两组,发现高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和甘油三酯有显著差异(阿替洛尔组与特拉唑嗪组:高密度脂蛋白胆固醇:-0.05(0.12)对+0.08(0.1)mmol/L,p = 0.04;甘油三酯:-0.18(0.61)对-0.59(0.6),p = 0.03)。
作为多药治疗方案的一部分,当α阻滞剂特拉唑嗪与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂联合使用以实现充分的血压控制时,其效果与阿替洛尔相当。此外,在对高血压合并高脂血症患者的血脂谱影响方面,特拉唑嗪优于阿替洛尔,因此对于高血压合并高脂血症患者,特拉唑嗪似乎是β阻滞剂的合理替代药物。