相似文献
1
Power and design considerations for a general class of family-based association tests: quantitative traits.
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Dec;71(6):1330-41. doi: 10.1086/344696. Epub 2002 Nov 21.
2
A multivariate family-based association test using generalized estimating equations: FBAT-GEE.
Biostatistics. 2003 Apr;4(2):195-206. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.195.
3
Power calculations for a general class of family-based association tests: dichotomous traits.
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Sep;71(3):575-84. doi: 10.1086/342406. Epub 2002 Aug 12.
4
Removing phenotypic distribution assumptions from tests of linkage disequilibrium for quantitative traits.
Genet Epidemiol. 2003 Apr;24(3):191-9. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10220.
5
The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jun;68(6):1463-74. doi: 10.1086/320590. Epub 2001 May 8.
6
On a general class of conditional tests for family-based association studies in genetics: the asymptotic distribution, the conditional power, and optimality considerations.
Genet Epidemiol. 2002 Aug;23(2):165-80. doi: 10.1002/gepi.209.
7
Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 May;66(5):1616-30. doi: 10.1086/302891. Epub 2000 Apr 12.
8
Score test for mapping quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size when the dominance effect is not negligible.
Genet Epidemiol. 2002 Nov;23(4):398-412. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10203.
9
Screening and replication using the same data set: testing strategies for family-based studies in which all probands are affected.
PLoS Genet. 2008 Sep 19;4(9):e1000197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000197.
10
QTL fine mapping, in extreme samples of finite populations, for complex traits with familial correlation due to polygenes.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jul;67(1):259-62. doi: 10.1086/302977.
引用本文的文献
1
On the analysis of metabolite quantitative trait loci: Impact of different data transformations and study designs.
Sci Adv. 2025 Apr 11;11(15):eadp4532. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp4532.
2
A family-based study of genetic and epigenetic effects across multiple neurocognitive, motor, social-cognitive and social-behavioral functions.
Behav Brain Funct. 2022 Dec 1;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12993-022-00198-0.
3
4
Candidate-gene association analysis for a continuous phenotype with a spike at zero using parent-offspring trios.
J Appl Stat. 2019 Dec 19;47(11):2066-2080. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1704226. eCollection 2020.
5
A unifying framework for rare variant association testing in family-based designs, including higher criticism approaches, SKATs, and burden tests.
Bioinformatics. 2021 Apr 1;36(22-23):5432-5438. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1055.
6
Innovative approach to identify multigenomic and environmental interactions associated with birth defects in family-based hybrid designs.
Genet Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;45(2):171-189. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22363. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
7
Quantitative genome-wide association analyses of receptive language in the Danish High Risk and Resilience Study.
BMC Neurosci. 2020 Jul 7;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12868-020-00581-5.
8
metaFARVAT: An Efficient Tool for Meta-Analysis of Family-Based, Case-Control, and Population-Based Rare Variant Association Studies.
Front Genet. 2019 Jun 19;10:572. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00572. eCollection 2019.
9
An Analytic Solution to the Computation of Power and Sample Size for Genetic Association Studies under a Pleiotropic Mode of Inheritance.
Hum Hered. 2016;81(4):194-209. doi: 10.1159/000457135. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
10
Test for association of common variants in GRM7 with alcohol consumption.
Alcohol. 2016 Sep;55:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2015.10.005. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
本文引用的文献
1
On a general class of conditional tests for family-based association studies in genetics: the asymptotic distribution, the conditional power, and optimality considerations.
Genet Epidemiol. 2002 Aug;23(2):165-80. doi: 10.1002/gepi.209.
2
Power calculations for a general class of family-based association tests: dichotomous traits.
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Sep;71(3):575-84. doi: 10.1086/342406. Epub 2002 Aug 12.
3
The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jun;68(6):1463-74. doi: 10.1086/320590. Epub 2001 May 8.
4
Testing quantitative traits for association and linkage in the presence or absence of parental data.
Hum Hered. 2001;51(4):183-91. doi: 10.1159/000053341.
5
Implementing a unified approach to family-based tests of association.
Genet Epidemiol. 2000;19 Suppl 1:S36-42. doi: 10.1002/1098-2272(2000)19:1+<::AID-GEPI6>3.0.CO;2-M.
6
A unified approach to adjusting association tests for population admixture with arbitrary pedigree structure and arbitrary missing marker information.
Hum Hered. 2000 Jul-Aug;50(4):211-23. doi: 10.1159/000022918.
7
Family-based tests of association and linkage that use unaffected sibs, covariates, and interactions.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Feb;66(2):605-14. doi: 10.1086/302782.
8
Removing the sampling restrictions from family-based tests of association for a quantitative-trait locus.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Feb;66(2):576-92. doi: 10.1086/302745.
9
A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families.
Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Jan;66(1):279-92. doi: 10.1086/302698.
10
Power comparisons of the transmission/disequilibrium test and sib-transmission/disequilibrium-test statistics.
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Aug;65(2):578-80. doi: 10.1086/302485.
Zotero 插件