Blersch Wendelin K, Draganski Bogdan M, Holmer Stefan R, Koch Horst J, Schlachetzki Felix, Bogdahn Ullrich, Hölscher Thilo
Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 84, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Radiology. 2002 Dec;225(3):693-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2253011572.
To determine the sensitivity of contrast material-enhanced transcranial color-coded sonography (c-TCCS) compared with that of contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (c-TEE) for detection of cardiac right-to-left shunt.
Forty consecutive patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack were admitted to the hospital and were examined by using c-TCCS and c-TEE. High-intensity transient signals (HITS) were counted for 25 seconds after the end of the Valsalva maneuver, and the numbers of HITS were classified in one of four categories (zero HITS, one to 10 HITS, >10 HITS without curtain, and curtain). A statistically significant difference was calculated with the Fisher exact test.
HITS were counted in 21 (52%) patients by using c-TCCS and c-TEE. With both tests, no HITS were counted in 15 (38%) patients. In two (5%) patients, no HITS were counted with c-TEE but three HITS in one patient and five HITS in the other were counted with c-TCCS. In two (5%) patients, no HITS were counted with c-TCCS, but a small patent foramen ovale (PFO) was seen at c-TEE. With c-TCCS, the sensitivity was 91% (21 of 23) and the specificity was 88% (15 of 17). In 23 patients examined with c-TCCS, 14 (61%) patients had category 1 PFO; seven (30%) patients, category 2 PFO; and two (9%) patients, category 3 PFO. Mean HITS count in patients with category 1 PFO was 4.4 and that for those with category 2 PFO was 27.6.
c-TCCS is a sensitive noninvasive method for detecting cardiac right-to-left shunt and is as sensitive as c-TEE.
确定对比剂增强经颅彩色编码超声检查(c-TCCS)与对比剂增强经食管超声心动图检查(c-TEE)在检测心脏右向左分流方面的敏感性。
连续40例中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者入院,接受c-TCCS和c-TEE检查。在瓦尔萨尔瓦动作结束后25秒内计数高强度瞬态信号(HITS),HITS数量分为四类之一(零个HITS、1至10个HITS、>10个HITS且无帷幕、有帷幕)。采用Fisher精确检验计算统计学显著差异。
使用c-TCCS和c-TEE在21例(52%)患者中计数到HITS。两种检查中,15例(38%)患者未计数到HITS。在2例(5%)患者中,c-TEE未计数到HITS,但c-TCCS在1例患者中计数到3个HITS,在另1例患者中计数到5个HITS。在2例(5%)患者中,c-TCCS未计数到HITS,但c-TEE发现小的卵圆孔未闭(PFO)。使用c-TCCS时,敏感性为91%(23例中的21例),特异性为88%(17例中的15例)。在接受c-TCCS检查的23例患者中,14例(61%)患者为1类PFO;7例(30%)患者为2类PFO;2例(9%)患者为3类PFO。1类PFO患者的平均HITS计数为4.4,2类PFO患者的平均HITS计数为27.6。
c-TCCS是检测心脏右向左分流的一种敏感的非侵入性方法,与c-TEE一样敏感。