Schneier Franklin R, Blanco Carlos, Antia Smita X, Liebowitz Michael R
Anxiety Disorders Clinic, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 69, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;25(4):757-74. doi: 10.1016/s0193-953x(02)00018-7.
Social anxiety disorder is well suited to the spectrum concept because it has trait-like qualities of early onset, chronicity, and no empirically derived threshold that demarcates normal from clinically significant trait social anxiety. Social anxiety disorder has been shown to respond to relatively specific pharmacologic and cognitive-behavioral therapies, which makes identification of other conditions that may lie on the social anxiety disorder spectrum important because of possible treatment implications. Biologic markers associated with social anxiety disorder also may be shared by similar but nonidentical traits, such as behavioral inhibition and detachment. Clarification of the trait spectrums associated with specific biologic systems offers an opportunity for improving the understanding of the origin of these conditions. Strong evidence exists that at least some forms of shyness, avoidant personality disorder, and selective mutism lie on a social anxiety disorder spectrum. For several other disorders that share a prominent focus on social comparison, significant subgroups of patients seem to have features of social anxiety disorder. These disorders include major depression (especially the atypical subtype), body dysmorphic disorder, and eating disorders. Several other disorders marked by social dysfunction or inhibition, including substance use disorders (especially alcoholism), paranoid disorder, bipolar disorder, autism, and Asperger's disorder, also may show some overlap with social anxiety disorder features (e.g., social anxiety as a cause or complication of substance abuse, social avoidance in paranoid disorder, social disinhibiton in bipolar disorder, and social communication deficits in autism and Asperger's disorder). Social anxiety disorder also is associated with other anxiety disorders in general and other phobias in particular. In respect to traits, a growing body of evidence links behavioral inhibition to the unfamiliar to a social anxiety disorder spectrum with some specificity. Biologic measures of dopamine system hypoactivity have been linked to social anxiety disorder, trait detachment, and general deficits in reward and incentive function. It remains to be clarified, however, whether this brain system function is best characterized by a social anxiety disorder spectrum or some variant that incorporates social reward deficits or social avoidance behavior. Social anxiety disorder, shyness, and behavioral inhibition all seem to have a genetic component, but more research is needed to attempt to identify a more specifically heritable temperament associated with these conditions. Finally, the emergent concept of a social anxiety spectrum needs maturation. Although the notion of a single social anxiety disorder spectrum currently has some clinical use, the authors believe that exclusive focus on the notion of a single continuum with two extremes--from social disinhibition in mania to the most severe form of social anxiety, avoidant personality disorder--is premature and limiting in respect to etiologic research. An alternative approach is to conceptualize multiple, probably overlapping spectra in this area of social psychopathology. Individual dimensions might be based on various core phenomenologic, cognitive, or biologic characteristics. A bottom-up biologic approach holds promise for identifying spectra with a common etiology that might respond to specific treatments. Taking a pluralistic view of the concept of spectrum at this stage may help accelerate our understanding of social anxiety and related disorders.
社交焦虑障碍非常适合谱系概念,因为它具有早发性、慢性等特质样特征,且没有基于实证得出的用以区分正常与具有临床意义的特质性社交焦虑的阈值。研究表明,社交焦虑障碍对相对特定的药物治疗和认知行为疗法有反应,这使得识别可能处于社交焦虑障碍谱系上的其他病症变得很重要,因为这可能会对治疗产生影响。与社交焦虑障碍相关的生物标志物也可能存在于类似但不完全相同的特质中,如行为抑制和超脱。阐明与特定生物系统相关的特质谱系,为增进对这些病症起源的理解提供了契机。有强有力的证据表明,至少某些形式的羞怯、回避型人格障碍和选择性缄默症处于社交焦虑障碍谱系上。对于其他一些同样高度关注社会比较的病症,有相当一部分患者似乎具有社交焦虑障碍的特征。这些病症包括重度抑郁症(尤其是非典型亚型)、躯体变形障碍和进食障碍。其他一些以社交功能障碍或抑制为特征的病症,包括物质使用障碍(尤其是酒精中毒)、偏执性障碍、双相情感障碍、自闭症和阿斯伯格障碍,也可能与社交焦虑障碍特征存在一些重叠(例如,社交焦虑作为物质滥用的原因或并发症、偏执性障碍中的社交回避、双相情感障碍中的社交脱抑制,以及自闭症和阿斯伯格障碍中的社交沟通缺陷)。社交焦虑障碍一般还与其他焦虑症相关,尤其与其他恐惧症相关。就特质而言,越来越多的证据将对陌生事物的行为抑制与社交焦虑障碍谱系有一定特异性地联系起来。多巴胺系统活性降低的生物学指标已与社交焦虑障碍、特质超脱以及奖励和激励功能的普遍缺陷相关联。然而,尚有待阐明的是,这种脑系统功能的最佳特征究竟是社交焦虑障碍谱系,还是某种包含社交奖励缺陷或社交回避行为的变体。社交焦虑障碍、羞怯和行为抑制似乎都有遗传成分,但还需要更多研究来试图确定与这些病症相关的更具特异性的可遗传气质。最后,社交焦虑谱系这一新兴概念需要进一步完善。尽管单一社交焦虑障碍谱系的概念目前在临床上有一定用途,但作者认为,仅关注从躁狂中的社交脱抑制到最严重形式的社交焦虑(回避型人格障碍)这一单一连续统两端的概念,在病因学研究方面为时过早且具有局限性。另一种方法是将社会心理病理学这一领域概念化为多个可能重叠的谱系。各个维度可能基于各种核心现象学、认知或生物学特征。一种自下而上的生物学方法有望识别出具有共同病因且可能对特定治疗有反应的谱系。在现阶段对谱系概念持多元观点,可能有助于加速我们对社交焦虑及相关病症的理解。