Laroche M L, Vergnenègre A, Druet-Cabanac M, Boutros-Toni F, Salamon R, Preux P-M
Service de l'Information Médicale et de l'Evaluation, Hôpital du Cluzeau, 23, avenue Dominique-Larrey, 87042 Limoges Cedex.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2002 Oct;50(5):433-9.
The aim of this study was to validate a new method of quality control of medical records of the "Medicalisation of Information System Program" (P.M.S.I.) in Limoges university hospital.
Lot quality assurance sampling (L.Q.A.S.), developed to meet industrial quality control needs, has been applied. This method allows to give an opinion on the quality of a lot from a sample randomised in this lot. Ten hospital units have been randomised. During three months, these medical units have recoded ten medical units abstracts (R.U.M.) which were randomised each month within their stays. If five or more R.U.M. had been modified on Principal Diagnosis (D.P.), Associated Significant Diagnosis (D.A.S.) or Diagnosis Related Group (D.R.G.), the lot was rejected. The hospital unit had then less 70% R.U.M. of good quality (alpha=5%). The global errors rates were compared to the results of usually performed quality control (1998).
Nine hospital units were included. Hospital units which already had a low quality rate during the 1998 quality control had also an insufficient quality by L.Q.A.S. method. Among these, 33.7 [CI(95%): 21.6-45.8] R.U.M. have been modified. Medical units had a poorer data quality than surgical ones. No statistically significant difference was shown between 1998 errors rates and L.Q.A.S. rates, except for D.P. (p=0.002).
L.Q.A.S. is easy to apply, could be repeated more frequently than usual controls, and allows to detect hospital units which require a faster action. This process could be applied to P.M.S.I., in which the search of quality is necessary because of the new cost model which includes secondary D.R.G.
本研究的目的是验证利摩日大学医院“信息系统医疗化项目”(P.M.S.I.)病历质量控制的一种新方法。
采用了为满足工业质量控制需求而开发的批质量保证抽样法(L.Q.A.S.)。该方法可根据从一批中随机抽取的样本对该批的质量给出意见。随机选取了10个医院科室。在三个月的时间里,这些医疗科室每月对10份医疗科室摘要(R.U.M.)进行编码,这些摘要在其住院期间是随机抽取的。如果在主要诊断(D.P.)、相关重要诊断(D.A.S.)或诊断相关组(D.R.G.)方面有5份或更多的R.U.M.被修改,则该批被拒收。此时该医院科室优质R.U.M.的比例低于70%(α=5%)。将总体错误率与通常进行的质量控制结果(1998年)进行比较。
纳入了9个医院科室。在1998年质量控制期间质量率较低的医院科室,采用L.Q.A.S.方法时质量也不达标。其中,有33.7 [置信区间(95%):21.6 - 45.8]份R.U.M.被修改。医疗科室的数据质量比外科科室差。除了主要诊断(p = 0.002)外,1998年的错误率与L.Q.A.S.方法得出的错误率之间未显示出统计学上的显著差异。
L.Q.A.S.易于应用,可以比通常的控制更频繁地重复进行,并且能够检测出需要更快采取行动的医院科室。这个过程可以应用于P.M.S.I.,由于新的成本模型(包括二级诊断相关组),在该项目中质量检查是必要的。