Suppr超能文献

择期腹部子宫切除术中预防性使用抗生素的安慰剂对照、双盲、随机研究。

Placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of prophylactic antibiotics in elective abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Chongsomchai C, Lumbiganon P, Thinkhamrop J, Ounchai J, Vudhikamraksa N

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2002 Dec;52(4):302-6. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1312.

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of a single dose of ampicillin or cefazolin in preventing fever and infection after elective abdominal hysterectomy, we conducted a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial at Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University and Khon Kaen Regional Hospital. Three hundred and thirty patients scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy were randomly allocated into either placebo, ampicillin or cefazolin groups. Patients received sterile water (3 mL) or ampicillin (1 g) or cefazolin (1 g) intravenously according to random assignment 30 min before the operation. After the operation, all patients were assessed by blinded independent evaluators until discharged from the hospitals. Our main outcome measures were postoperative fever and infectious morbidity. We found that 321 patients (97.3% of recruited patients) were available for data analysis, 108 in placebo, 106 in ampicillin and 107 in cefazolin group. Febrile morbidity occurred in 13/108 (12.0%), 14/106 (13.2%) and 12/107 (11.2%) of patients in the placebo, ampicillin and cefazolin groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in febrile morbidity between the three groups. Infectious morbidity was found in 29/108 (26.9%), 24/106 (22.6%) and 11/107 (10.3%) of patients in the placebo, ampicillin and cefazolin groups, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the placebo and cefazolin groups (P = 0.002). Between the placebo and ampicillin groups, the result was not significantly different (P = 0.476). There was a statistically significant difference between the cefazolin and ampicillin groups (P = 0.015). The common causes of infectious morbidity were urinary tract infection, vaginal cuff infection and surgical wound infection. We concluded that antibiotic prophylaxis by cefazolin should be recommended for elective total abdominal hysterectomy.

摘要

为评估单剂量氨苄西林或头孢唑林预防择期腹式子宫切除术后发热和感染的疗效,我们在孔敬大学医学院素林亚林医院和孔敬地区医院开展了一项多中心、随机、双盲、对照试验。330例计划接受择期腹式子宫切除术的患者被随机分为安慰剂组、氨苄西林组或头孢唑林组。患者在手术前30分钟根据随机分组静脉注射无菌水(3毫升)、氨苄西林(1克)或头孢唑林(1克)。术后,由盲法独立评估者对所有患者进行评估,直至出院。我们的主要观察指标为术后发热和感染发病率。我们发现321例患者(占招募患者的97.3%)可用于数据分析,安慰剂组108例,氨苄西林组106例,头孢唑林组107例。安慰剂组、氨苄西林组和头孢唑林组发热发病率分别为13/108(12.0%)、14/106(13.2%)和12/107(11.2%)。三组间发热发病率无统计学显著差异。安慰剂组、氨苄西林组和头孢唑林组感染发病率分别为29/108(26.9%)、24/106(22.6%)和11/107(10.3%)。安慰剂组和头孢唑林组间有统计学显著差异(P = 0.002)。安慰剂组和氨苄西林组间结果无显著差异(P = 0.476)。头孢唑林组和氨苄西林组间有统计学显著差异(P = 0.015)。感染发病率常见原因包括尿路感染、阴道残端感染和手术切口感染。我们得出结论,对于择期全腹式子宫切除术,应推荐使用头孢唑林进行抗生素预防。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验