• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹疝修补术的结果:开放和腹腔镜入路下缝合修补与补片植入(覆盖法与衬入法)的比较——前瞻性、随机、多中心研究]

[Results of ventral hernia repair: comparison of suture repair with mesh implantation (onlay vs sublay) using open and laparoscopic approach--prospective, randomized, multicenter study].

作者信息

Wéber György, Horváth Ors Péter

机构信息

Pécsi Tudományegyetem AOK Sebészeti Klinika, 7624 Pécs, Ifjúság útja 13.

出版信息

Magy Seb. 2002 Oct;55(5):285-9.

PMID:12474512
Abstract

Incisional hernias is a frequent complication following abdominal surgery, it develops in 11-20% of patients who had laparotomies. Different operative techniques are used for repair but results are often poor. In the absence of valid scientific data, there is no general agreement on the best surgical treatment. To provide evidence based surgery a nation-wide multi-center, prospective, randomized study is set up. The present study compares suture and mesh repairs in different positions, using open and laparoscopic approach to define standard indication for the treatment of incisional hernias. The study was started in March, 2002, with 23 surgical departments participating. Each report about 100 patients with incisional hernia repair. The 2300 consecutive patients (who are 18 to 70 years old) with primary incisional hernia or first recurrent umbilical hernia are randomized. Patients are divided in two groups. If the hernia is between 5-25 cm2 (Group I) they are selected at random either for prosthetic (sublay) or suture repair. In patients with a hernia larger than 25 cm2 (Group II) mesh is implanted at random as either sublay or onlay position using a computer randomization program. After a short learning period, in Group II the laparoscopic approach will also be randomized. Postoperative outcome, complications and recurrence are recorded. The study will run for five years. All collected data are sent to the coordinating center via internet to be entered into database.

摘要

切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症,在接受剖腹手术的患者中发生率为11% - 20%。虽然采用了不同的手术技术进行修复,但效果往往不佳。由于缺乏有效的科学数据,对于最佳手术治疗方法尚无普遍共识。为了提供循证医学的手术依据,开展了一项全国性多中心、前瞻性、随机研究。本研究比较了不同位置的缝合修补和补片修补,采用开放和腹腔镜手术方式来确定切口疝治疗的标准指征。该研究于2002年3月启动,有23个外科科室参与。每个科室报告约100例切口疝修补患者。将2300例连续的原发性切口疝或首次复发性脐疝患者(年龄在18至70岁之间)随机分组。患者分为两组。如果疝面积在5 - 25平方厘米之间(第一组),则随机选择进行假体(腹膜前)修补或缝合修补。对于疝面积大于25平方厘米的患者(第二组),使用计算机随机程序随机将补片植入腹膜前或腹膜外位置。经过短暂的学习期后,第二组患者的腹腔镜手术方式也将进行随机选择。记录术后结果、并发症和复发情况。该研究将持续五年。所有收集的数据通过互联网发送至协调中心并录入数据库。

相似文献

1
[Results of ventral hernia repair: comparison of suture repair with mesh implantation (onlay vs sublay) using open and laparoscopic approach--prospective, randomized, multicenter study].[腹疝修补术的结果:开放和腹腔镜入路下缝合修补与补片植入(覆盖法与衬入法)的比较——前瞻性、随机、多中心研究]
Magy Seb. 2002 Oct;55(5):285-9.
2
["Onlay" mesh provides significantly better results than "sublay" reconstruction. Prospective randomized multicenter study of abdominal wall reconstruction with sutures only, or with surgical mesh--results of a five-years follow-up].["外置" 补片比 "内置" 重建效果显著更好。仅用缝线或使用外科补片进行腹壁重建的前瞻性随机多中心研究——五年随访结果]
Magy Seb. 2010 Oct;63(5):302-11. doi: 10.1556/MaSeb.63.2010.5.3.
3
Long-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的长期疗效
Arch Surg. 2007 Jun;142(6):562-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.6.562.
4
[Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery. A comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs].[切口疝手术25年经验。432例切口疝修补术的比较性回顾研究]
Chirurg. 2003 Jul;74(7):638-45. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0594-2.
5
[Incisional hernia prosthetic surgery: a prospective study comparing laparoscopic and open techniques].切口疝修复手术:一项比较腹腔镜与开放技术的前瞻性研究
G Chir. 2009 May;30(5):201-14.
6
[Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: our experience and review of the literature].[腹腔镜切口疝修补术:我们的经验及文献综述]
Chir Ital. 2007 Sep-Oct;59(5):671-7.
7
Surgical treatment of incisional hernia.切口疝的外科治疗
Br J Surg. 2002 May;89(5):534-45. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02083.x.
8
Laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias.腹腔镜下修复大型切口疝。
Am Surg. 2002 Jun;68(6):530-3; discussion 533-4.
9
Components separation technique and laparoscopic approach: a review of two evolving strategies for ventral hernia repair.成分分离技术与腹腔镜手术方法:腹疝修补两种不断发展的策略综述
Am Surg. 2005 Jul;71(7):598-605.
10
Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernias.复发性腹疝的腹腔镜修补术
Am Surg. 1998 Dec;64(12):1121-5; discussion 1126-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between the open and the laparoscopic approach in the primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放与腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Feb 3;409(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03241-y.
2
What Is the Current Knowledge About Sublay/Retro-Rectus Repair of Incisional Hernias?关于切口疝的腹膜前/腹直肌后修补术,目前有哪些认识?
Front Surg. 2018 Aug 13;5:47. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00047. eCollection 2018.
3
A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, observer and patient blind study to evaluate a non-absorbable polypropylene mesh vs. a partly absorbable mesh in incisional hernia repair.
一项随机、多中心、前瞻性、观察者和患者盲法研究,旨在评估在切口疝修补术中使用不可吸收聚丙烯网片与部分可吸收网片的效果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1225-34. doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-1009-6. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
4
Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.切口疝的开放手术方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2.
5
Minimally invasive ventral herniorrhaphy: an analysis of 6,266 published cases.微创腹疝修补术:对6266例已发表病例的分析
Hernia. 2008 Feb;12(1):9-22. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0286-4. Epub 2007 Oct 18.