Springer M P
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, afd. Huisartsgeneeskunde en Verpleeghuisgeneeskunde, Postbus 2088, 2301 CB Leiden.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Nov 9;146(45):2132-4.
With the publication of the Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline 'Examination of the neonate', a discussion which has lasted several decades has been brought to an end. Up to now a second neonatal examination by the general practitioner on the third, fourth or fifth day after a midwife-assisted birth was recommended. The arguments in support of this recommendation were based on the following: (a) the limited expertise of midwives in the past, (b) the experience that general practitioners had in examining children, although this experience was not specifically related to the defects for which neonates should be checked, and (c) the government bodies' wish to restrict the number of hospital deliveries by giving greater structure to the organisation of midwife care, which in practice, did not lead to large changes. Based on three studies, the practice guideline recommends that a second examination is of no added value.
随着荷兰全科医生学院《新生儿检查》实践指南的发布,一场持续了数十年的讨论落下帷幕。到目前为止,一直建议全科医生在助产士协助分娩后的第三天、第四天或第五天进行第二次新生儿检查。支持这一建议的论据基于以下几点:(a)过去助产士的专业知识有限;(b)全科医生在检查儿童方面的经验,尽管这种经验与新生儿应检查的缺陷并无特定关联;(c)政府机构希望通过优化助产护理组织架构来限制医院分娩数量,而实际上这并未带来重大改变。基于三项研究,该实践指南建议二次检查并无额外价值。