Atwell Julie A, Conners Frances A, Merrill Edward C
The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa 35487, USA.
Am J Ment Retard. 2003 Jan;108(1):56-68. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2003)108<0056:IAELIY>2.0.CO;2.
We examined intelligence-related differences in explicit and implicit learning using an artificial grammar paradigm. Young adults with and without mental retardation completed a sequence-learning and identification task. For some participants, sequences were constructed following an artificial grammar; for others, sequences were random. Explicit learning was determined by ability to learn and later identify random sequences. Implicit learning was determined by the tendency to incorrectly identify new grammatical sequences as seen before, relative to new nongrammatical sequences. Participants with mental retardation did more poorly than participants without mental retardation on explicit learning but just as well on implicit learning. Results suggest that learning of complex materials, when accomplished through implicit processing, is functionally equivalent in individuals with and without mental retardation.
我们使用人工语法范式研究了显性学习和隐性学习中与智力相关的差异。有和没有智力障碍的年轻成年人完成了一项序列学习和识别任务。对于一些参与者,序列是按照人工语法构建的;对于另一些参与者,序列是随机的。显性学习通过学习和随后识别随机序列的能力来确定。隐性学习通过相对于新的非语法序列,将新的语法序列错误地识别为之前见过的倾向来确定。有智力障碍的参与者在显性学习方面比没有智力障碍的参与者表现更差,但在隐性学习方面表现相当。结果表明,当通过隐性加工完成复杂材料的学习时,有和没有智力障碍的个体在功能上是等效的。