Orner Roderick J, Stolz Peter
Department of Clinical Psychology, Baverstock House, Lincoln, England.
J Trauma Stress. 2002 Dec;15(6):465-71. doi: 10.1023/A:1020965805343.
Psychotherapy and psychotraumatology share a preoccupation with repetition phenomena, manifested as transference, compulsions to repeat, or intrusive reexperiencing. Terminological diversity obscures compelling similarities between these repetition phenomena and discourages speculation about processes involved in their genesis. This paper remedies these oversights by integrating recent empirical evidence pertaining to memory with European intellectual traditions embraced by its pioneering dynamic psychotherapists. Using dreams as a prototype repetition, the phenomenological diversity of repetition phenomena is shown to be reconcilable with current evidence about memory encoding, storage, and retrieval. Differences in persistence, intensity, pervasiveness, and treatment resilience of repetition phenomena are explained using concepts derived from psychological and biological sciences. Implications for psychotherapeutic theory, practice, and evaluation are considered.
心理治疗和心理创伤学都关注重复现象,这些现象表现为移情、强迫性重复或侵入性的再次体验。术语的多样性掩盖了这些重复现象之间令人信服的相似之处,并阻碍了对其产生过程的推测。本文通过整合与记忆相关的最新实证证据以及其开创性的动力心理治疗师所接受的欧洲知识传统,弥补了这些疏忽。以梦作为重复的原型,重复现象的现象学多样性被证明与当前关于记忆编码、存储和检索的证据是一致的。使用从心理和生物科学中衍生出来的概念来解释重复现象在持续性、强度、普遍性和治疗恢复力方面的差异。同时也考虑了对心理治疗理论、实践和评估的影响。