Bosman Tommy, Van Laere Koen, Santens Patrick
Division of Nuclear Medicine, P7, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Jan;30(1):16-24. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1009-9. Epub 2002 Oct 25.
The clinical differentiation between typical idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) and atypical parkinsonian disorders such as multiple system atrophy (MSA) is complicated by the presence of signs and symptoms common to both forms. The goal of this study was to re-evaluate the contribution of brain perfusion single-photon emission tomography (SPET) with anatomical standardisation and automated analysis in the differentiation of IPD and MSA. This was achieved by discriminant analysis in comparison with a large set of age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers. Technetium-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer SPET was performed on 140 subjects: 81 IPD patients (age 62.6+/-10.2 years; disease duration 11.0+/-6.4 years; 50 males/31 females), 15 MSA patients (61.5+/-9.2 years; disease duration 3.0+/-2.2 years; 9 males/6 females) and 44 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers (age 59.2+/-11.9 years; 27 males/17 females). Patients were matched for severity (Hoehn and Yahr stage). Automated predefined volume of interest (VOI) analysis was carried out after anatomical standardisation. Stepwise discriminant analysis with cross-validation using the leave-one-out method was used to determine the subgroup of variables giving the highest accuracy for this differential diagnosis. Between MSA and IPD, the only regions with highly significant differences in uptake after Bonferroni correction were the putamen VOIs. Comparing MSA versus normals and IPD, with putamen VOI values as discriminating variables, cross-validated performance showed correct classification of MSA patients with a sensitivity of 73.3%, a specificity of 84% and an accuracy of 83.6%. Additional input from the right caudate head and the left prefrontal and left mesial temporal cortex allowed 100% discrimination even after cross-validation. Discrimination between the IPD group alone and healthy volunteers was accurate in 94% of the cases after cross-validation, with a sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 100%. The three-group classification (MSA, IPD and healthy volunteers) resulted in an overall accuracy of 86% post hoc, with 98% of normals, 78% of IPD and 93% of MSA correctly classified. These values were slightly lower after cross-validation: 96% for healthy volunteers, 77% for IPD and 67% for MSA. In conclusion, using age- and gender-matched healthy volunteer data and anatomical standardisation, it is possible to differentiate between IPD and MSA with high discriminating power in clinically relevant circumstances.
典型特发性帕金森病(IPD)与多系统萎缩(MSA)等非典型帕金森综合征之间的临床鉴别因两种疾病存在共同的体征和症状而变得复杂。本研究的目的是重新评估经解剖标准化和自动分析的脑灌注单光子发射断层扫描(SPET)在IPD和MSA鉴别诊断中的作用。这是通过与大量年龄和性别匹配的健康志愿者进行判别分析来实现的。对140名受试者进行了锝-99m半胱氨酸乙酯二聚体SPET检查:81例IPD患者(年龄62.6±10.2岁;病程11.0±6.4年;男性50例/女性31例),15例MSA患者(61.5±9.2岁;病程3.0±2.2年;男性9例/女性6例),以及44名年龄和性别匹配的健康志愿者(年龄59.2±11.9岁;男性27例/女性17例)。患者根据严重程度(Hoehn和Yahr分期)进行匹配。在解剖标准化后进行自动预定义感兴趣区(VOI)分析。采用留一法交叉验证的逐步判别分析来确定对该鉴别诊断具有最高准确性的变量亚组。在MSA和IPD之间,经Bonferroni校正后摄取差异高度显著的唯一区域是壳核VOI。以壳核VOI值作为判别变量,比较MSA与正常人和IPD,交叉验证结果显示MSA患者的正确分类敏感性为73.3%,特异性为84%,准确性为83.6%。即使经过交叉验证,来自右侧尾状核头部、左侧前额叶和左侧颞叶内侧皮质的额外输入仍能实现100%的区分。在交叉验证后,仅IPD组与健康志愿者之间的区分在94%的病例中是准确的,敏感性为91.4%,特异性为100%。三组分类(MSA、IPD和健康志愿者)事后总体准确性为86%,98%的正常人、78%的IPD患者和93%的MSA患者被正确分类。交叉验证后这些值略低:健康志愿者为96%,IPD为77%,MSA为67%。总之,使用年龄和性别匹配的健康志愿者数据以及解剖标准化,在临床相关情况下能够以高鉴别力区分IPD和MSA。