Health Devices. 2002 Nov;31(11):397-417.
Alarm-safety issues are nothing new in healthcare. ECRI, for example, has emphasized the importance of alarm safety for many years. Yet patients continue to be injured or killed because of ineffective alarm coverage, inappropriate alarm use, and failure to hear alarms. And countless "near miss" incidents occur that are never reported. In July of this year, the U.S. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) intensified the focus on this topic in U.S. hospitals by making alarm safety one of its National Patient Safety Goals for 2003. Hospitals addressing JCAHO's recommendations for meeting this goal need to know what to do and what not to do. This special Guidance Article provides advice on just what JCAHO expects, how U.S. hospitals should respond to its initiative, and how much in the way of time and resources will be required. In addition, we detail our broad-based recommendations on improving alarm safety, which cover issues that are common to healthcare institutions around the world.
警报安全问题在医疗保健领域并非新鲜事。例如,医疗保健研究与质量机构(ECRI)多年来一直强调警报安全的重要性。然而,由于警报覆盖无效、警报使用不当以及未能听到警报,患者仍不断受到伤害或死亡。而且发生了无数从未报告的“险些发生的事故”。今年7月,美国医疗保健机构认证联合委员会(JCAHO)将警报安全列为其2003年全国患者安全目标之一,从而加强了对美国医院这一主题的关注。应对JCAHO关于实现这一目标的建议的医院需要知道该做什么和不该做什么。这篇特别的指导文章就JCAHO的期望是什么、美国医院应如何回应其倡议以及需要多少时间和资源提供了建议。此外,我们详细阐述了关于改善警报安全的广泛建议,这些建议涵盖了世界各地医疗机构普遍存在的问题。