Suppr超能文献

腰麻-硬膜外联合镇痛是分娩镇痛的首选技术。

Combined spinal epidural analgesia is the preferred technique for labour analgesia.

作者信息

Russell R

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2002;53(4):331-4.

Abstract

To justify its place as the preferred method of pain relief in labour, CSE must demonstrated a clear superiority over epidural analgesia. Looking at the relative efficacy of the two techniques failure rates appear to be equal. Speed of onset may be faster with an initial spinal injection although perhaps only clinically relevant in advanced labour where the quality of analgesia may sometimes be better. CSE would not seem to offer significant advantage in terms of mode of delivery or the ability to ambulate. The side effects of the technique are somewhat more concerning as CSE would appear to carry slightly greater risk than epidural analgesia, most notably in neurological sequelae and the effects of intrathecal opioids. Certainly CSE confers no benefit in terms of cost. What then is the place of CSE in labour analgesia? Its potential benefit makes it a reasonable option when there is a clear clinical advantage such as requests for analgesia in late labour or where maternal distress is extreme or where epidural analgesia has been ineffective. However even in such situations the slight increase in risk must be weighed against the possible advantage. Consequently the CSE cannot at the present time be recommended as the preferred option for labour analgesia.

摘要

为证明其作为分娩镇痛首选方法的地位,腰麻 - 硬膜外联合阻滞(CSE)必须展现出相较于硬膜外镇痛的明显优势。从这两种技术的相对疗效来看,失败率似乎相当。最初进行脊髓注射时起效速度可能更快,不过这或许仅在产程后期才具有临床相关性,因为此时镇痛质量有时可能更好。在分娩方式或活动能力方面,CSE似乎并无显著优势。该技术的副作用更令人担忧,因为CSE似乎比硬膜外镇痛的风险略高,最显著的是在神经后遗症以及鞘内注射阿片类药物的影响方面。当然,CSE在成本方面也没有优势。那么CSE在分娩镇痛中的地位如何呢?当存在明确的临床优势时,例如产妇在分娩后期要求镇痛、产妇极度痛苦或硬膜外镇痛无效时,其潜在益处使其成为一个合理的选择。然而,即便在这种情况下,也必须将风险的轻微增加与可能的优势进行权衡。因此,目前不能推荐CSE作为分娩镇痛的首选方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验