Tronvik Erling, Stovner Lars J, Helde Grethe, Sand Trond, Bovim Gunnar
Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
JAMA. 2003 Jan 1;289(1):65-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.1.65.
There is a paucity of effective, well-tolerated drugs available for migraine prophylaxis.
To determine whether treatment with the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan is effective as a migraine-prophylactic drug.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study performed in a Norwegian neurological outpatient clinic from January 2001 to February 2002.
Sixty patients aged 18 to 65 years with 2 to 6 migraine attacks per month were recruited mainly from newspaper advertisements.
A placebo run-in period of 4 weeks was followed by two 12-week treatment periods separated by 4 weeks of placebo washout. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive one 16-mg candesartan cilexetil tablet daily in the first treatment period followed by 1 placebo tablet daily in the second period. The remaining 30 received placebo followed by candesartan.
The primary end point was number of days with headache; secondary end points included hours with headache, days with migraine, hours with migraine, headache severity index, level of disability, doses of triptans, doses of analgesics, acceptability of treatment, days of sick leave, and quality-of-life variables on the Short Form 36 questionnaire.
In a period of 12 weeks, the mean number of days with headache was 18.5 with placebo vs 13.6 with candesartan (P =.001) in the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 57). Some secondary end points also favored candesartan, including hours with headache (139 vs 95; P<.001), days with migraine (12.6 vs 9.0; P<.001), hours with migraine (92.2 vs 59.4; P<.001), headache severity index (293 vs 191; P<.001), level of disability (20.6 vs 14.1; P<.001) and days of sick leave (3.9 vs 1.4; P =.01), although there were no significant differences in health-related quality of life. The number of candesartan responders (reduction of > or =50% compared with placebo) was 18 (31.6%) of 57 for days with headache and 23 (40.4%) of 57 for days with migraine. Adverse events were similar in the 2 periods.
In this study, the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan provided effective migraine prophylaxis, with a tolerability profile comparable with that of placebo.
可用于偏头痛预防的有效且耐受性良好的药物匮乏。
确定血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂坎地沙坦作为偏头痛预防性药物的治疗效果。
2001年1月至2002年2月在挪威一家神经科门诊进行的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉研究。
主要通过报纸广告招募了60名年龄在18至65岁之间、每月有2至6次偏头痛发作的患者。
4周的安慰剂导入期之后是两个12周的治疗期,中间有4周的安慰剂洗脱期。30名患者被随机分配在第一个治疗期每天服用1片16毫克的坎地沙坦酯片,第二个治疗期每天服用1片安慰剂。其余30名患者先服用安慰剂,然后服用坎地沙坦。
主要终点是头痛天数;次要终点包括头痛小时数、偏头痛天数、偏头痛小时数、头痛严重程度指数、残疾程度、曲坦类药物剂量、镇痛药剂量、治疗可接受性、病假天数以及简短健康调查问卷36项的生活质量变量。
在意向性分析(n = 57)中,在12周的时间里,安慰剂组头痛的平均天数为18.5天,坎地沙坦组为13.6天(P = 0.001)。一些次要终点也有利于坎地沙坦,包括头痛小时数(139小时对95小时;P < 0.001)、偏头痛天数(12.6天对9.0天;P < 0.001)、偏头痛小时数(92.2小时对59.4小时;P < 0.001)、头痛严重程度指数(293对191;P < 0.001)、残疾程度(20.6对14.1;P < 0.001)和病假天数(3.9天对1.4天;P = 0.01),尽管在与健康相关的生活质量方面没有显著差异。头痛天数方面,与安慰剂相比,坎地沙坦反应者(减少≥50%)在57名患者中有18名(31.6%);偏头痛天数方面有23名(40.4%)。两个治疗期的不良事件相似。
在本研究中,血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂坎地沙坦可有效预防偏头痛,其耐受性与安慰剂相当。