Kunkel Adrianne Dennis, Dennis Michael Robert
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Death Stud. 2003 Jan;27(1):1-38. doi: 10.1080/07481180302872.
In an ever more deadly and uncertain world, rhetoric honoring the deceased is still examined as though that was its primary, if not only, function. Some critics of eulogia also identify the consolation of survivors but rarely define it precisely or analyze its rhetorical execution. This article introduces a framework for the critical analysis and production of eulogia that draws from comforting mechanisms recognized in the interpersonal communication, social psychology, and grief therapy literatures. Self-disclosure, problem-focused coping, positive reappraisal, and the affirmation and continuation of relationships with the deceased are shown to inform criticism of five contemporary eulogies. Challenges inherent in the invention and appreciation of eulogy rhetoric are thus illuminated and addressed.
在一个日益致命且充满不确定性的世界里,缅怀逝者的言辞仍被审视,仿佛这是其主要功能,即便不是唯一功能。一些悼词批评者也提到了对幸存者的慰藉,但很少对其进行精确界定或分析其修辞运用。本文引入了一个用于批判性分析和撰写悼词的框架,该框架借鉴了人际沟通、社会心理学和悲伤治疗文献中认可的安慰机制。自我表露、聚焦问题的应对方式、积极的重新评价,以及与逝者关系的确认和延续,被证明为对五篇当代悼词的批评提供了依据。由此,悼词修辞的创作与理解中所固有的挑战得以阐明和解决。