Carvalho Sirley, Büki Béla, Bonfils Pierre, Avan Paul
Laboratory of Sensory Biophysics, School of Medicine, PO Box 38, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Hear Res. 2003 Jan;175(1-2):215-25. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00745-1.
The rather shallow growth of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAE) with click intensity, namely <1 dB/dB, distinguishes genuine CEOAEs from stimulus artifacts, thereby providing the rationale for the popular 'derived nonlinear recording' method. However, other CEOAE nonlinearities regarding phase or envelope dependence on stimulus intensity have been barely acknowledged so far. The present work used CEOAEs from 20 normal ears recorded in response to 50-86 dB peak equivalent SPL clicks. The phases of CEOAE spectral components varied considerably with click intensity (sometimes more than 120 degrees ), mostly in a monotonic manner and in such a way that in the majority of ears, phase lagged with increasing intensity. When present, synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions exhibited the same behavior. In a few instances, conspicuous frequency shifts of CEOAE spectral peaks were seen. In contrast to CEOAE phases, envelopes were almost intensity-invariant. This behavior contrasts with that of basilar membrane motion at the place tuned to the stimulus frequency, as consistently disclosed by several recent publications, i.e., no phase shift and large envelope shift with stimulus intensity. It is thought that the phase invariance of basilar membrane motion implies that whatever they do, outer hair cells cannot alter the resonance frequency of the cochlear partition. If one elaborates along this line of reasoning, the large phase shift of CEOAEs with click intensity implies that CEOAEs at frequency f cannot come from the place tuned to f and that instead, they may be intermodulation distortion products produced by nonlinear interactions between spectral components of the click stimulus over a significant length of the basilar membrane.