Acikel Cengiz, Oncul Oral, Ulkur Ersin, Bayram Ismail, Celikoz Bahattin, Cavuslu Saban
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burn Unit, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003 Jan-Feb;24(1):37-41. doi: 10.1097/00004630-200301000-00008.
Silver sulfadiazine 1%, mupirocin 2%, and fusidic acid 2% were compared to assess the antibacterial effect of a once-daily application on experimental rat 15% full-skin thickness burn wounds seeded 24 hours earlier with a 10 standard strain of methicillin-resistant staphylococci. The quantitative counts of seeded organism in burn eschar and subjacent muscle were determined at postburn day 7, beside the cultures of blood and lung biopsies. All tested topical agents were equally effective against methicillin-resistant in reducing local burn wound bacterial count and preventing systemic infection.
比较了1%磺胺嘧啶银、2%莫匹罗星和2%夫西地酸,以评估每日一次应用于实验大鼠15%全层皮肤厚度烧伤创面的抗菌效果,该创面在24小时前接种了10标准株耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。在烧伤后第7天,除了进行血液和肺活检培养外,还测定了烧伤焦痂和下方肌肉中接种细菌的定量计数。所有测试的局部用药在减少局部烧伤创面细菌计数和预防全身感染方面,对耐甲氧西林菌的效果相同。