Gilliam F G, Veloso F, Bomhof M A M, Gazda S K, Biton V, Ter Bruggen J P, Neto W, Bailey C, Pledger G, Wu S-C
University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Neurology. 2003 Jan 28;60(2):196-202. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000048200.12663.bc.
To evaluate topiramate as monotherapy in adults and children with recently diagnosed, localization-related epilepsy, comparing two dosages of topiramate in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.
Adults and children (>/=3 years of age) were eligible if the maximum interval since epilepsy diagnosis was 3 years and patients had one to six partial-onset seizures during a 3-month retrospective baseline. At study entry, patients (N = 252) were untreated or receiving one antiepileptic drug for less than 1 month. After randomization to 50 or 500 mg/d topiramate (25 or 200 mg/d if weight </= 50 kg), patients remained in the study until 4 months after the last patient was randomized or until patients met seizure-related exit criteria (e.g., had two seizures). The primary efficacy outcome was a univariate analysis of time-to-exit, which was time to second seizure in 96% of patients.
The time-to-exit (median, 422 days vs 293 days) favored the higher dose of topiramate, but this difference was not significant. When time-to-exit was analyzed with time-to-first-seizure as a covariate, the difference between dosage groups was significant (p = 0.01), reflecting the higher seizure-free rates (54% vs 39%, p = 0.02) and longer time-to-first-seizure (median 317 days vs 108 days; p = 0.06) in patients receiving 200 or 500 mg/d topiramate. Higher plasma concentration was associated with increased time-to-first seizure (p < 0.01). Dose-related adverse events included paresthesia, weight loss, diarrhea, and hypoesthesia.
Although the primary efficacy analysis was negative, time-to-exit analyses that included time-to-first-seizure as a covariate, between-group differences in seizure-free rates, and longer time-to-first-seizure with higher serum concentration provide evidence that topiramate is effective as monotherapy in patients with localization-related epilepsy.
在一项多中心、随机、双盲研究中,比较两种剂量的托吡酯,评估其作为新近诊断的局限性癫痫成人和儿童患者单一疗法的疗效。
癫痫诊断后最长间隔时间为3年且在3个月回顾性基线期内有1至6次部分性发作的成人和儿童(≥3岁)符合入选条件。研究开始时,患者(N = 252)未接受治疗或接受一种抗癫痫药物治疗少于1个月。随机分为托吡酯50或500 mg/d(体重≤50 kg者为25或200 mg/d)后,患者继续留在研究中,直至最后一名患者随机分组后4个月或直至患者符合与癫痫发作相关的退出标准(如发作两次)。主要疗效指标是对退出时间的单变量分析,96%的患者的退出时间是至第二次癫痫发作的时间。
退出时间(中位数,422天对293天)有利于较高剂量的托吡酯,但这种差异不显著。当以首次癫痫发作时间作为协变量分析退出时间时,剂量组之间的差异显著(p = 0.01),这反映了接受200或500 mg/d托吡酯的患者无癫痫发作率较高(54%对39%,p = 0.02)以及首次癫痫发作时间较长(中位数317天对108天;p = 0.06)。较高的血浆浓度与较长的首次癫痫发作时间相关(p < 0.01)。与剂量相关的不良事件包括感觉异常、体重减轻、腹泻和感觉减退。
虽然主要疗效分析为阴性,但将首次癫痫发作时间作为协变量的退出时间分析、无癫痫发作率的组间差异以及较高血清浓度下较长的首次癫痫发作时间提供了证据,表明托吡酯作为局限性癫痫患者的单一疗法是有效的。