Eckstein H-H, Eichbaum M, Klemm K, Doerfler A, Ringleb P, Bruckner T, Allenberg J-R
Clinic for Vascular Surgery-Ludwigsburg, Teaching Hospital of the University of Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls University of Heidelberg, D-71640 Heidelberg, Posilipostrasse 4, Germany.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003 Feb;25(2):168-74. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1820.
to examine the relationship between the degree of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis and changes in the ipsilateral ICA blood flow after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
in a prospective study we studied 51 patients with unilateral 60-99% ICA stenosis (median degree 84%, asymptomatic stenosis n = 13, symptomatic stenosis n = 38). The degree of ICA diameter stenosis was determined by ex-vivo plastination of the surgically removed atherosclerotic specimen and video-assessed planimetry. Intraoperative transit time ultrasound flow measurements of the carotid arteries were performed before and after CEA. Blood flow changes were assessed by mathematical approximations. Statistics were done by use of the Wilcoxon signed Rank test.
common carotid artery (CCA) and ICA median blood flow increased after CEA from 370 and 130 ml/min to 450 and 282 ml/min, respectively (p <.001). The relative increase of ICA blood flow was 5% and 18% for 60-69% and 70-79% ICA stenosis (n.s.) but 70% and 247% for 80-89% and 90-99% stenosis (p <.001 each). Mathematical evaluation (fourth-polynomal function) determined a significant increase of carotid blood flow after CEA in ICA stenosis of > or =82.3%.
in the absence of severe contralateral ICA occlusive disease a significant increase of ipsilateral ICA blood flow by CEA can be expected in patients with an ICA stenosis of > or =82.3% (linear degree of stenosis, ECST criteria).
研究颅外颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄程度与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后同侧ICA血流变化之间的关系。
在一项前瞻性研究中,我们研究了51例单侧ICA狭窄60%-99%的患者(狭窄程度中位数为84%,无症状狭窄n = 13,有症状狭窄n = 38)。通过对手术切除的动脉粥样硬化标本进行体外塑化和视频评估平面测量来确定ICA直径狭窄程度。在CEA前后对颈动脉进行术中通过时间超声血流测量。通过数学近似法评估血流变化。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计学分析。
CEA后颈总动脉(CCA)和ICA的血流中位数分别从370 ml/min和130 ml/min增加到450 ml/min和282 ml/min(p <.001)。ICA狭窄60%-69%和70%-79%时,ICA血流相对增加分别为5%和18%(无统计学意义),但狭窄80%-89%和90%-99%时分别为70%和247%(均p <.001)。数学评估(四次多项式函数)确定,ICA狭窄≥8